Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 12-12-2008, 01:44 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Thats what I meant, and I dont think it puts yours to shame, it just shows that resulting data vs. dollars spent is not a linear scale by any means. $10000 worth of gear will not produce a 100% better image than $1000 worth of gear. it would also depend on processing, but thats another equasion...
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-12-2008, 05:30 PM
Jen's Avatar
Jen
Moving to Pandora

Jen is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Swan Hill
Posts: 7,102
now that is a cool pic once again Fred nice work i love your pics
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-12-2008, 07:51 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Thanks Jen, pleased you like it.

Alex, cause it puts me to shame, Im not that vain , look at it, it even stands up well against Robs effort, different, and lacking in some ways, but better in others. Given its with a DSI/Meade/Atalux, its a beedin masterpiece, I bet it took a lot of effort, and a prime example for your gear cost arguement.

Not that I totally agree with your arguement (but I do with the non linear aspect), that image is something out of the ordinary for the gear, theres something else going on thats not obvious (exceptional seeing, uber processing skill/time).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement