Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 14-11-2008, 03:19 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut View Post
Alex

Well done, thats a very nice wide field. The single subs high background also hides the noise somewhat, and theres a fair bit of noise in the stack too. I think you would be supprised how darks would clean it up, even though you got a good result without them .

What I ment in the previous post was, I thought you had a SINGLE 1hr 42m exposure. Obviously not, its the total exposure time .

Did you find a big difference in noise in the different ISO subs?
To be honest I did not worry..it was more a case it seemed fair,,noise ..even 1600 long exposure was not too bad and the processing ..I had only downloaded deep sky stacker and needed something to run on it..

alex
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 14-11-2008, 07:17 PM
seeker372011's Avatar
seeker372011 (Narayan)
6EQUJ5

seeker372011 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,663
Alex was all of this on your EQ6?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 14-11-2008, 07:43 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Yes Narayan unguided of course.
alex
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement