Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 29-10-2008, 05:52 AM
montewilson's Avatar
montewilson (Monte)
Registered User

montewilson is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN View Post
I thought that upon first use also... Since then, my opinion of the mount has only got better... with it now holding upwards of 20kgs of gear, and 4 counterweights, and still maintaining tracking accuracy.. Value for money, the EQ6 CAN NOT be beat..

Value for money agreed! I wish they were available 20 years ago.

There is one caveat with the EQ6. Some are great and some should have been strangled at birth. It's a bit of a lotto. They don't have the QC of high end brands. See if you can get a good understanding with your vendor about what you want as a minimum of performance from the mount so you can swap it if it is a bit of a dog.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 31-10-2008, 06:38 PM
lesbehrens's Avatar
lesbehrens (Les)
Les

lesbehrens is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Qld
Posts: 525
OK eq 6 mount. should i just use my 10"or buy a smaller scope to star out? cand the camera. should i go dslr or webcam?
les
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 31-10-2008, 07:13 PM
deadsimple's Avatar
deadsimple (Ash)
Registered User

deadsimple is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 180
Quote:
Originally Posted by lesbehrens View Post
OK eq 6 mount. should i just use my 10"or buy a smaller scope to star out? cand the camera. should i go dslr or webcam?
les
What's your budget?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 31-10-2008, 07:34 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
if budget can allow, a DSLR will get better images, larger field of view (this is important because your scope has a 1250mm focal length to start with)

You could look at a shorter focal length to start out, My advise would be to go for something like an ED80, you can image through that unguided for a while (provided you spend a good amount of time and accurately drift align) then as you get confident, get a side by side mounting set up, and guide with the ED80, imaging through the 10"..

Seems like a nice progression to me..

Alex.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 31-10-2008, 07:39 PM
lesbehrens's Avatar
lesbehrens (Les)
Les

lesbehrens is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Qld
Posts: 525
is it worht wile getting a ed 80 or just use the 10"?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 31-10-2008, 07:46 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Well.. For a starting point, the ED80 will be much easier to use.. a 600~mm focal length is a lot more forgiving than a 1250mm. It will be easier to balance, easier to setup etc... and come 6 months time when you decide you want to step up to a guided setup, you already have the guide scope, and can start imaging through the 10" which will give you bigger image scale..

It will just be much easier for you to start out with the ED80 than the 10"... Thats not to say it can not be done, hell, my first decent deep sky image came out of my C11 @ 1750mm focal length, however that was guided, I doubt it could be done unguided.

I would recommend going for an ED80 if your budget allows, and starting out like that....
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 31-10-2008, 07:50 PM
lesbehrens's Avatar
lesbehrens (Les)
Les

lesbehrens is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Qld
Posts: 525
what is an ed 80 worth? i have seen differnt prices of differnt brands. could i use a normal refractor to start? it will be cheeper?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 31-10-2008, 07:58 PM
lesbehrens's Avatar
lesbehrens (Les)
Les

lesbehrens is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Qld
Posts: 525
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN View Post
Well.. For a starting point, the ED80 will be much easier to use.. a 600~mm focal length is a lot more forgiving than a 1250mm. It will be easier to balance, easier to setup etc... and come 6 months time when you decide you want to step up to a guided setup, you already have the guide scope, and can start imaging through the 10" which will give you bigger image scale..

It will just be much easier for you to start out with the ED80 than the 10"... Thats not to say it can not be done, hell, my first decent deep sky image came out of my C11 @ 1750mm focal length, however that was guided, I doubt it could be done unguided.

I would recommend going for an ED80 if your budget allows, and starting out like that....

ok . y is the focal length a concern?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 31-10-2008, 08:37 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
you could use an achromatic refractor, however the quality of the images produced generally wont be as good...

An ED80 will cost anywhere between 600 - 900 depending on brand, where you buy it from etc.

They are however among the most used scopes for astro imaging.

Focal length is a concern, because, unless you're guiding, the longer the focal length, the more quickly drift and periodic error will ruin images.. Even with a 100% perfect polar alignment, I've not seen a mount that will take unguided exposures of say 5 ~ 6 minutes without showing some signs of drift with a 1250mm focal length... After tweaking my alignment for a few hours, I managed 4 minutes unguided with a 700mm focal length.. but at 1250mm, even the slightest drift off course will show up..

Im sure someone else can explain this better than I am at the moment... Im rather pre-occupied sitting at my mount at the moment trying to snap off a M20 image before it disappears below the tree line..
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 31-10-2008, 09:01 PM
bloodhound31
Registered User

bloodhound31 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,628
Maybe I can help,

I was in your shoes not so long ago, but I have written about every experience along the way that others might benefit from the journey. Try these pages mate and pick my brains whenever you like.

http://www.asignobservatory.com/astr...phy_guide.aspx
http://www.asignobservatory.com/webc...otography.aspx
http://www.asignobservatory.com/book_review.aspx
http://www.asignobservatory.com/optical_trains.aspx
http://www.asignobservatory.com/drift_alignment.aspx

Cheers,

Baz.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 31-10-2008, 09:12 PM
lesbehrens's Avatar
lesbehrens (Les)
Les

lesbehrens is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Qld
Posts: 525
ok cool. thanks for your help.looks like i will get a ed 80, eq6, dslr.
going to cost a lot . but i think it will be worth it all!!!!
what do i look for in a dslr? i have nevenr used on befor
les
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 31-10-2008, 09:33 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
for a starter in deep sky imaging, I would buy either a 2nd hand modified 350D (if you can find one) or a 450D.. The 450D has live view, which will make focusing SO much easier.

A 2nd hand modded 350 will set you back around $500~$600 (unmodified 2nd hand 350's go for around $300~$400 online.

A 450D brand new, with no lenses will cost about $900.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 01-11-2008, 02:21 AM
Tandum's Avatar
Tandum (Robin)
Registered User

Tandum is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wynnum West, Brisbane.
Posts: 4,166
I think you should get an eq mount, eq6 is ok for that 10", mount the dob on it and get used to the mount, and then plug in a web cam and image planets. At this point you will find you need laptops, extension tubes, barlows etc etc.

Then look at guide scopes, dslr's etc, 2nd hand and go from there.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 01-11-2008, 02:28 AM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
^^ Thats what I did... ^^
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 01-11-2008, 11:56 AM
lesbehrens's Avatar
lesbehrens (Les)
Les

lesbehrens is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Qld
Posts: 525
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN View Post
for a starter in deep sky imaging, I would buy either a 2nd hand modified 350D (if you can find one) or a 450D.. The 450D has live view, which will make focusing SO much easier.

A 2nd hand modded 350 will set you back around $500~$600 (unmodified 2nd hand 350's go for around $300~$400 online.

A 450D brand new, with no lenses will cost about $900.

what is a modded dslr?
sohuld i learn to ues the eq first? like tandum suggested then step up.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 01-11-2008, 03:51 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Planetary imaging really gives you a chance to be lazy, and not learn things like drift alignment, the importance of polar alignment and so on..

I got my EQ6 initially so I could take better planetary images, however because of this, I had no real need or want to learn much about my mount at all... It worked, but it was never polar aligned well or anything like that, And i put off drift aligning because i didnt really need to do it... Now that im into deep sky imaging, polar alignment is critical, and it took me quite a while to know how to do get it there...

Yes you could go that way, but its not likely to teach you to use your mount to its potential...

A modded DSLR is a camera thats had the standard IR filter removed, and had either a clear glass replacement, or a Ba'ader/hutech IR filter added...

From the factory, DSLR's are not very sensitive to Ha light.. Ha light is very important to imaging nebulae, so astronomers find ways around this lack of sensitivity. buy removing the standard IR filter, which block everything from IR right the way through the Ha spectrum, and replacing it with a specialized astronomy filter, The Ha (red) spectrum comes out a lot stronger in images, and provides much more pleasing results.

Alex.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 01-11-2008, 06:49 PM
lesbehrens's Avatar
lesbehrens (Les)
Les

lesbehrens is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Qld
Posts: 525
i am not to woried about planet but dso. i have just orderd the eq6 i an going to use the 10"on it but i wont have the eq6 for a few months(apprentice wages)just a dslr to go. but i then have to learn how to image. i hope its fun. more q to come.
les

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN View Post
Planetary imaging really gives you a chance to be lazy, and not learn things like drift alignment, the importance of polar alignment and so on..

I got my EQ6 initially so I could take better planetary images, however because of this, I had no real need or want to learn much about my mount at all... It worked, but it was never polar aligned well or anything like that, And i put off drift aligning because i didnt really need to do it... Now that im into deep sky imaging, polar alignment is critical, and it took me quite a while to know how to do get it there...

Yes you could go that way, but its not likely to teach you to use your mount to its potential...

A modded DSLR is a camera thats had the standard IR filter removed, and had either a clear glass replacement, or a Ba'ader/hutech IR filter added...

From the factory, DSLR's are not very sensitive to Ha light.. Ha light is very important to imaging nebulae, so astronomers find ways around this lack of sensitivity. buy removing the standard IR filter, which block everything from IR right the way through the Ha spectrum, and replacing it with a specialized astronomy filter, The Ha (red) spectrum comes out a lot stronger in images, and provides much more pleasing results.

Alex.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 01-11-2008, 08:59 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Mate.. fun doesnt even begin to describe it....

As we all do, expect to have a period of teething problems, where things dont all go to plan.. Its all part of the natural learning curve..

Believe me, the first time you finish a 4 ~ 5 minute exposure and see the result on the cameras LCD... All the hardship that it took to get to that point simply erase themselves from your memory... I can still remember the smile on my face the day I took my first deep sky image... Its amazing..

Best of luck with it, and remember, Asking questions is the key to learning... it doesnt matter if the question seems dumb, ask it...

You're not far from me, and quite a few other very capable astro imagers, If at any stage you need a hand, myself and others around you will gladly help out (especially if a night under your dark skies is on offer )

Cheers.
Alex.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 01-11-2008, 09:28 PM
stephenb's Avatar
stephenb (Stephen)
Registered User

stephenb is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: all over the shop...
Posts: 2,098
Well done Les. It looks like you are on your way! I look forward to hearing about your successes and failures. It is all a big learning curve but there are plenty of resources and people to assist.

While I whole heartedly agree with the concept of modding the DSLR, I have not done this on mine, mainly because it is my only camera and it is still under warranty. No need to jump into modding a new one, unless of course you can pick up a modded camera.

clear skies
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 01-11-2008, 09:29 PM
bobson (Bob)
Registered User

bobson is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: perth
Posts: 599
This might be dumb question but I have to ask

Canon 350D, is it some special camera for astrophotography or normal DSLR but modified so it can fit into focuser? If not, where do you buy those, or where I could see a picture of them?

thanks
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement