Thanks to all of you for the great comments!
Quote:
Originally Posted by dugnsuz
The resolution provided by the 127mm scope tops the ED80.
I like the colour balance too between the Flame nebula, the blue wispy nebulosity in the centre and that 'blanket' of red behind the Horsehead itself.
I like this one - the QYH8 with your scope is a winner.
Cheers
Doug
|
Thanks for the great feedback! Yes I think the 127 is probably the best bang for the buck in a refractor at the moment. However I do like the colour correction of the good ol' ED80!
Quote:
Originally Posted by seeker372011
so that's where you were this weekend
top result there
|
Yep... dark skies called, a loud call and a clear call that couldn't be denied... so I went!
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy
lovely result- I expect to get something like that with the 127 - when I can get to use it!!
|
We're all waiting to see your results with your 127! Get into it mate!
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb
Hi Rob, in your case because you don't have diffraction spikes going all over the place I think you could make a circular mask around the halo, then composite another sub with less DDP without the halo if possible then blend them in and bump up the levels back to the original picture. That could work.
|
Yes, I think you're on the right track.
I also wonder if I can somehow isolate the spectral content of the flare, then select the circle and subtract the flare's spectral content.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RB
Rob that's a beautiful shot !
My only suggestion would be to lift the black point slightly to brighten the background.
I agree, it looks like internal reflection off the camera filter.
Probably try reducing your subs if there's high contrast objects.
|
Strangely, I see lots of background detail on my monitor. There's a lot of difference between monitors, I wonder if mine's too bright in the shadows and needs a gamma adjustment?
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN
I wonder... If you were to use the clear glass window on the QHY8, then use a T-adapter with a higher quality (baader/astronomik) UV/IR block, if that would fix the problem...
I had a problem similar to this when I used my UHC filter stacked on the UV/IR on my QHY8 imaging Antares.... Although my reflection was much more prominent than that...
|
Yes a filter with superior A/R coatings should help. I wonder if I can get a spec. on the existing filter from QHY?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghsmith45
Have a look at this thread re star halos. One of the links I gave there has changed. Here is the new url
|
Thanks, I'll check those out, the more info I can get the better!
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghsmith45
You can do this in PS, but it's quite complicated to explain.
|
A lot of us would like to learn more... I wonder, If you could find time to put together a tutorial I'm sure a lot of folks here would find it useful.
Quote:
Originally Posted by allan gould
Must be due to the internal reflections within the QHY8 as same scope with 20D gives a different pattern and different extent of flare. See this link http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/a...se.php?a=48481
What has always amazed me is the off - centered blue halos seen with WO scopes which is definately NOT the case with the 127mm scopes here. A bright star can be off-centered but still give a symetrical halo. Sign of good even optics.
PS Great image.
|
Thanks! Seems the 127 is quite sound optically. Just needs a bit of work on the focuser.
Cheers,
Rob