Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 01-09-2008, 09:46 PM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,820
I feel most sorry for Matt, who suffered awful seeing conditions in Canberra when it was hitting 9/10 in Brissie. Since the poor fellow relocated to Brissie, it’s been an awful period of seeing, not to mention fewer nights on which to even consider dragging the gear outside!

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-09-2008, 09:51 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
You feel sorry for him??? MATT IS TO BLAME FOR OUR SEEING!! He brought it with him from A.C.T.!!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-09-2008, 10:30 AM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis View Post
A couple of seasons ago, the seeing was soooo good that I almost didn’t need to process the AVI’s in Registax, the detail was popping out on individual frames!
Ahhhhh.

Yes...I remember your images from that period, Dennis, and recall thinking to myself 'Wow!!! I gotta hi-tail it to Brizzy"

As you say, no such luck this apparition.

But nice work on Uranus and the moons

Dennis, you've inspired me to have a crack at this myself. I've never imaged Uranus. But I may as well while I wait for my new LRGB filter set to arrive.

Last edited by matt; 02-09-2008 at 11:50 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-09-2008, 11:17 AM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN View Post
You feel sorry for him??? MATT IS TO BLAME FOR OUR SEEING!! He brought it with him from A.C.T.!!
Nah.

The seeing was already crap when I arrived in late July '07.

You can't pin that one on me, bucko!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-09-2008, 11:44 AM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
:p
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-09-2008, 06:42 PM
spearo's Avatar
spearo (Frank)
accepts all donations

spearo is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Braidwood (outskirts)
Posts: 2,281
very cool stuff and as Striker said, i too love the presentation
very impressive stuff
frank
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-09-2008, 07:13 PM
Babalyon 5
Registered User

Babalyon 5 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 181
Yeah, way cool! Kudos for a not often imaged planet!
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-09-2008, 08:20 PM
theodog's Avatar
theodog (Jeff)
Every photon is sacred !

theodog is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Coonabarabran
Posts: 1,071
Its been a while since I checked this forum out.
I'm glad I did.
What a cracker of an effort.
Well done Dennis!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-09-2008, 09:52 AM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
I'm considering having a go at this tonight, Dennis.

Although it's quite windy today, and the seeing's going to be horrid.
It probably doesn't matter too much about the seeing, since I'm not trying to capture very fine planetary surface detail as is the case with Jupiter.

I wonder what length exposure I'd need to set using the C9.25, DMK 21AF04 and 3x barlow??? Would it be wise to use some kind of filter (IR)?? Hmmm.

It'll be a night of experimentation
.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 06-09-2008, 10:04 AM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt View Post
I'm considering having a go at this tonight, Dennis.

Although it's quite windy today, and the seeing's going to be horrid.
It probably doesn't matter too much about the seeing, since I'm not trying to capture very fine planetary surface detail as is the case with Jupiter.

I wonder what length exposure I'd need to set using the C9.25, DMK 21AF04 and 3x barlow??? Would it be wise to use some kind of filter (IR)?? Hmmm.

It'll be a night of experimentation
.
Hi Matt

Great stuff – if this horrendous wind eases I might just get out there myself as well.

Here is a link to a CN Post where a guy has used his 8” Newt at F19.6 with a DMK21AF04.AS - you should find his settings in there; I think he was exposing for 2.8 secs at a Gain of 950.

If you want an easy start, I’d go for Neptune at the prime focus of your C9.25; you should be able to pick up his moon Triton quite easily. I usually leave the IR block filter on the DMK camera just to protect the chip from dust bunnies.

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 06-09-2008, 10:06 AM
Deeno's Avatar
Deeno
“We are star-stuff”

Deeno is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Coast
Posts: 1,317
Very Cool....
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 06-09-2008, 10:20 AM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,820
Here are a couple of screen prints from SkyTools:
  • Neptune – Triton separation 73 arcsec for around 11:00pm.
  • Uranus – Umbriel separation 17 arcsec at around 9:30pm.
I was using the cooled and more sensitive ST7 at F48 with 15 sec exposures just to get some image scale. Not too sure how tonight’s conditions will hold up for such long exposures!

The Uranian (?) moon positions are not as favourable compared to the time I grabbed them.

Cheers

Dennis
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Uranus and Moons.jpg)
16.7 KB11 views
Click for full-size image (Neptune Triton.jpg)
8.0 KB10 views
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 06-09-2008, 01:29 PM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
As always...most helpful

Many thanks, Dennis.

I'll be keeping an eye on the wind conditions. I checked the BOM website and the forecast is for the winds to die down. Fingers crossed.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 06-09-2008, 01:34 PM
Matty P's Avatar
Matty P (Matt)
Star Struck

Matty P is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 2,797
Good luck Dennis and Matt. Let's hope the conditions improve and you have a great night. I'll be looking forward to the results if you do.

I'm all clouded out down here at the moment.

Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 06-09-2008, 01:37 PM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
Hopefully conditions will improve for you, Matty

The jetstream's looking 'Super Dodge' for SE Queensland (as per the attached image).

So what's new?!?!?!
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (sat-jetstream.jpg)
199.6 KB7 views
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 06-09-2008, 01:47 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Nasty looking map Matt... There will be no scope action for me tonight... Maybe lunar photo or two.. but nothing more serious than that...

Or maybe just test the C11 for visual use...
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 06-09-2008, 02:28 PM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
Hi Alex.

Yeah...moonage could definitely be an option.

When did the C11 arrive? How exciting.

Last edited by matt; 06-09-2008 at 07:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 06-09-2008, 04:31 PM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,820
We’re still being pounded by the wind here, so maybe just a bit of visual observing will have to suffice for tonight? Must find my set of eyepieces and figure out how to use them!

Cheers

Dennis

PS – Matt, I read somewhere that the C11’s just don’t cut it, and that the C9.25 is the preferred ‘scope for serious planetary imagers!
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 06-09-2008, 04:47 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
it arrived yesterday. unfortunately for me it balances ok without anything on it, it will not balance however with camera/dew shield/heater band etc etc.. I need another counterweight...

I think I'll just use the old 8" tonight.. I'll go somewhere monday and get another counterweight.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 06-09-2008, 05:10 PM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis View Post
PS – Matt, I read somewhere that the C11’s just don’t cut it, and that the C9.25 is the preferred ‘scope for serious planetary imagers!
In which comic book did you read this???
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement