Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 18-03-2008, 11:04 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Yes guys I did have the mount saddle pointing E-W, caps off, shaft extended, light off and all systems go....... I just couldnt see any stars and Im confident I was pointing somewhere near the scp.

I wonder if the polar scope is out of focus? I haven't investigated yet if focus can be adjusted. Hmmmm. I'll certainly do the daytime alignment of the polar scope, but i doubt pointing upward at 38 degrees Im going to find any distant reference object so a close one will have to do Thanks for the Tip Darryl and thanks Terry also for the verbose replies.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 18-03-2008, 11:40 PM
Kokatha man
Registered User

Kokatha man is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 486
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starkler View Post
I'll certainly do the daytime alignment of the polar scope, but i doubt pointing upward at 38 degrees Im going to find any distant reference object so a close one will have to do Thanks for the Tip Darryl and thanks Terry also for the verbose replies.
Hi Geoff - you don't have to have the scope's altitude approximating your latitude to do the reticle alignment. If I'm sounding "knowledgable" (as well as verbose!) let me say that even though we have the Willunga escarpment behind and around us here at Sellicks Beach, and I was up on my ob platform several metres above the ground with a very tall radar tower atop the hills, I was becoming agitated because of the same concerns!

Untill I did the unthinkable: when all else fails read the manual - which made me realize I could set the polar axis into a horizontal position and align the reticle in the most comfortable of positions!

Regards, Darryl.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 18-03-2008, 11:44 PM
Kokatha man
Registered User

Kokatha man is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 486
ps..ps...

In addition to my further comments just below on reticle alignment; the polar scope's focus is effected by "screwing out" its' eyepiece.....
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 18-03-2008, 11:51 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kokatha man View Post
Untill I did the unthinkable: when all else fails read the manual - which made me realize I could set the polar axis into a horizontal position and align the reticle in the most comfortable of positions!

Regards, Darryl.
Lol, yes I did think of this after making my last post and had a chuckle to myself about missing the obvious.

The run of clear nights in Melbourne has come to an end for now. Stay tuned for the next exciting (*cough*) episode
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 19-03-2008, 11:01 AM
Terry B's Avatar
Terry B
Country living & viewing

Terry B is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Armidale
Posts: 2,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starkler View Post
Yes guys I did have the mount saddle pointing E-W, caps off, shaft extended, light off and all systems go....... I just couldnt see any stars and Im confident I was pointing somewhere near the scp.

I wonder if the polar scope is out of focus? I haven't investigated yet if focus can be adjusted. Hmmmm. I'll certainly do the daytime alignment of the polar scope, but i doubt pointing upward at 38 degrees Im going to find any distant reference object so a close one will have to do Thanks for the Tip Darryl and thanks Terry also for the verbose replies.
Your welcome
I have found that even with a full moon I can still see some stars through the polar scope with hte light off so you should be able to see something. Try in daylight.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 20-03-2008, 10:19 AM
White Rabbit's Avatar
White Rabbit
Space Cadet

White Rabbit is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,411
I picked mine yesterday, but unlike Geof (who seems to have some knowleged in these things) I'm a complete n00b with this equitorial mount thing.

I hope you dont mind me posting my own questions in this thread, I figure that there is already on thread going, why make another.

I have lots of questions and I'm very confused at the moment, but I'll do some research on this drift aligning today and I'll post my questions later
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 20-03-2008, 10:50 AM
White Rabbit's Avatar
White Rabbit
Space Cadet

White Rabbit is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,411
Mmmm, maybe I will start my own thread because I dont want to cloud your post with my questions.

Thanks
Sandy
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 20-03-2008, 11:39 AM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by White Rabbit View Post
I picked mine yesterday, but unlike Geof (who seems to have some knowleged in these things) I'm a complete n00b with this equitorial mount thing.

I hope you dont mind me posting my own questions in this thread, I figure that there is already on thread going, why make another.
No problem at all. If you're a Synscan noob this thread is for you!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 20-03-2008, 12:37 PM
Kokatha man
Registered User

Kokatha man is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 486
ditto...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Starkler View Post
No problem at all. If you're a Synscan noob this thread is for you!
Ditto Geoff's comments WR: in fact keeping subject matter in one thread is much better (imho) because it's easier to find - though trolling through the various threads on a particular subject is very rewarding if you set yourself to do it.

I've been around a long time (starting to fossilize!) but only recently came back into AA with a vengeance; so all the new tech gear takes some adapting - but in real terms I personally have only stolen a couple of months or so on Geoff re acquiring the HEQ5 Pro, and we're all learning aspects of identical equipment as well as bringing our individual knowledge/experience and tricks/tips into the equation.

Cheers, Darryl.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 20-03-2008, 03:28 PM
White Rabbit's Avatar
White Rabbit
Space Cadet

White Rabbit is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,411
Ok thanks.

From what I'm reading there are two differnt ways to align these mounts with the sky. First is to polar align them or you can drift align them. Or are they one and the same thing.

So my question is two fold, for starters.

How many different ways can this mount be aligned?
Which is easier?

(ok three fold)
Which is the most accurate?

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 20-03-2008, 03:47 PM
White Rabbit's Avatar
White Rabbit
Space Cadet

White Rabbit is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,411
Next question. lol.

On my Meade I could sync a star if it was a little off centre, you could bring it back into the center view and hold the enter button down and it would sync, the next time you slew to that star it would be centered. Kind of like updating your alignment on the fly. Does the Syncscan have a feature like this? I cant seem to find it in the manual if it does.

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 20-03-2008, 04:58 PM
Kokatha man
Registered User

Kokatha man is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 486
HEQ5 questions.....

Hi WR - in answer to your question(s) about polar alignment, alignment via the polar scope and drift aligning are meant to equate with the same result, ie polar alignment.

In practice, drift alignment would have to be the most exacting methodology as it is a dynamic technique: having said that, if you perform a very accurate polar alignment by other means you can arrive at a very close equivalent.

From my perspective it is better to achieve polar alignment (without jumping straight to drift align procedure) by using your scope to polar align with the South Celestial Pole rather than your polar scope - it eliminates a couple of mechanical errors in the mount assembly.

My method is in one of my posts below, and as I say, I find that a star will stay in the cross-hairs of my scope's illuminated reticle ep for a very long time. I don't as yet do any astro-imaging, but I know that should I need to drift align at a much higher magnification to really "nail it" I would need to effect very little adjustment with my method - ie extra-fine drift aligning would be very easy.

Can't answer your question about star "synching" but there are several updates to the Version 3.0 that you can download, and one of the other fellas may be able to help you there.

Cheers, Darryl.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 21-03-2008, 01:21 PM
White Rabbit's Avatar
White Rabbit
Space Cadet

White Rabbit is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,411
Thanks.

Here is what I'm doing, can you tell me if I'm doing something wrong.

My location is Sydney so I set the Lat on the mount to 33 deg. Then point the mount 12deg east of magnetic south. Then I should do a three star alignment.
From what I can tell thats all I should have to do to get it roughly aligned with the SCP, or am I missing something?
I've been doing two star alignments without much luck so far. Mainly because I have a lot of trees and light poloution where I am and cant really see all the alignment stars, finding two is a push three is is really hard.

Thanks for the help.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 21-03-2008, 02:28 PM
KG8's Avatar
KG8
Registered User

KG8 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 303
Often the polar scope is not aligned with the mount. You can verify this by getting an object in the crosshairs of the polarscope (daytime) and then rotating the mount around the RAaxis. Look through the polarscope as you rotate, if you see the object you have centered in the hairs drift in and out you need to adjust the crosshair recticle via the 3 little grub screws on the polarscope. Be carefull !!! Overtighten them and you will smash the recticle, too loose and it will fall out. Do the job like you were collimating an sct. ie, trial and error

Last edited by KG8; 21-03-2008 at 02:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 21-03-2008, 03:55 PM
Kokatha man
Registered User

Kokatha man is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 486
polar alignment.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by White Rabbit View Post
Thanks.

Here is what I'm doing, can you tell me if I'm doing something wrong.

My location is Sydney so I set the Lat on the mount to 33 deg. Then point the mount 12deg east of magnetic south. Then I should do a three star alignment.
From what I can tell thats all I should have to do to get it roughly aligned with the SCP, or am I missing something?
I've been doing two star alignments without much luck so far. Mainly because I have a lot of trees and light poloution where I am and cant really see all the alignment stars, finding two is a push three is is really hard.

Thanks for the help.
KG8 says: "Often the polar scope is not aligned with the mount. You can verify this by getting an object in the crosshairs (daytime) and then rotating the mount around the RAaxis. If you see the object you have centered in the hairs drift in and out you need to adjust the crosshair recticle via the 3 little grub screws on the polarscope. Be carefull !!! Overtighten them and you will smash the recticle, too loose and it will fall out. Do the job like you were collimating an sct. ie, trial and error"


Hi WB - on page 3 of this "Equipment" section of the IIS forum "Bug in Synscan 3.21 upgrade" there is further info on HEQ5 Pro's, including a bit about the reticle alignment in the polar scope that KG8 elaborates on in the preceding post. Good to know that it is something to do cautiously KG8 - I must've been lucky when I took to it! Alan Gould astually took his polar scope out to set it (see thread mentioned above.)

Just to explain WB, the reticle is the super-imposed images and central cross with rings you see in the polar scope - it has the Octans asterism (ie star pattern) in it for you to overlay onto the real Octans asterism you should see when your PS is pointing at the right spot in the sky: the reticle also has the Northern Hemisphere patterns which we ignore.

Aligning the PS reticle is what KG8 describes, scroll down in this thread to see a bit more, and remember that this is done with a fixed distant object in the daytime as your target, and you will need to set the polar axis parallel to the ground to facilitate this procedure (otherwise the PS will be aimed so high you won't be able to find any fixed object to target!)

Remember that when you set that "south" leg (the one with "N" on it!) to point geo south so that the azimuth spigot above it is also pointing south, you then have to make sure the tripod is level. I use a "bullet" level, a circular one that they use for levelling fridges etc; it fits nicely in the round hole at the top of the tripod. You will need to screw down the long bolt that holds the HEQ5 head assembly to the tripod top to fit one of these levels into the depression - but you will also have needed to do this if you are placing a compasss on top of the tripod to get your bearings; otherwise the bolt will affect the compass's reading, being steel.

Having done all this, I'm presuming you've entered your co-ordinates and time etc into the handpiece before you do the 3 star alignment: I've noticed when following this method, that the 1st and 2nd stars are quite a bit out when the scope slews to them, but the 3rd is much closer in alignment for the subsequent "alignment successful" display we hope to see.

To get a better polar alignment and subsequent "GoTo" response you should go right back to the part where I've described levelling the tripod after pointing it south (correcting for magnetic variation) and setting the altitude to approximate your latitude.

This is where you put the HEQ5 head onto the tripod top with the 2 azimuth screws wound right out and wind up that long bolt from underneath (the steel one I mentioned.) Do not overtighten this bolt to facilitate azimuth adjustment in the next step.

It's night-time, good and dark now; you've aligned your polar scope reticle in the daytime and your peering through the PS to see any stars - not forgetting to screw out the PS's eyepiece to get focus!

If you're very lucky (and I say this because I don't rely on this luck - see my posts further down in this thread) you just might see the Octans asterism (the real one, not the one etched on the reticle!) in the PS's field of view: but you would have had to have been very accurate with the compass and latitude settings to see them, owing to the narrow field of view in the PS.

This is where you use the mount's fine adjustment azimuth and altitude adjustment knobs/screws to overlay the etched reticle asterism pattern onto the real Octans star pattern. You should then have achieved fairly good polar alignment and then, if you do a 3 star alignment, should find your GoTo functioning quite well.

The red LED illuminator provided with this mount is for helping you see the PS etched reticle pattern when doing the above; but most people reckon it just floods out their view, and either flick it on and off as they adjust the alt-az to get the etched and real stars to overlap each other, or don't use the LED at all.

As alluded to, this is only one way to polar align and not my preferred method, to me it is too fiddly and chancey; I would recommend using the main scope with a very low power wide angle ep to get the centre of the FOV pointing roughly just up from sigma Octans, using the mount's az-alt fine adjusters to achieve this, and then switch to a 12.5mm illuminated reticle ep to really nail it.

From the other posts you will see that I'm a really big fan of the green laser pointers when they are accurately set up, they are accurate enough on my scopes for me to dispense with a lower power wide field ep and just go straight to the illuminated reticle - I obviously do my initial alt-az fine adjustments after rough set-up by getting my laser beam to hit a spot just above sigma Octans!

Don't forget to finally tighten that long steel bolt right up to "lock" the mount and head!

Cheers, Darryl.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 21-03-2008, 06:15 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
I did the reticle alignment yesterday
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 21-03-2008, 08:52 PM
White Rabbit's Avatar
White Rabbit
Space Cadet

White Rabbit is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,411
Thanks Darryl and KG8.

The problem that I have though is that I cant see the SCP from my location due to a rather large tree, coupled with the fact that I live close to the city and the even if there were no obstructions there is no way I could seed those stars throught the polar scope.

So is close enough good enough? With the method I described above can you obtain a decent alignment?

Thanks
Sandy
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 21-03-2008, 08:53 PM
White Rabbit's Avatar
White Rabbit
Space Cadet

White Rabbit is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,411
Of course, it been raining since I bought scope so I cant actually get out and try out you sugestions.

AARRRRGGGG!!!
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 21-03-2008, 09:10 PM
Kokatha man
Registered User

Kokatha man is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 486
near enough.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by White Rabbit View Post
Thanks Darryl and KG8.

The problem that I have though is that I cant see the SCP from my location due to a rather large tree, coupled with the fact that I live close to the city and the even if there were no obstructions there is no way I could seed those stars throught the polar scope.

So is close enough good enough? With the method I described above can you obtain a decent alignment?

Thanks
Sandy
Hi again Sandy - that is a real problem; but if you follow your original method and a 3 star align turns out successfull, you will have reasonable GoTo results - but if you want to track accurately, or have better GoTo performance or get into imaging, then you are going to have to learn drift alignment procedure!!!

Cheers, Darryl.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 21-03-2008, 10:04 PM
White Rabbit's Avatar
White Rabbit
Space Cadet

White Rabbit is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,411
Thanks for the reply.

Now I now where to start, that was my biggest stumbling block. Now I need to buy the illuminated reticle eyepiece.

Thanks for giving me some directions.

Sandy
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement