Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Eyepieces, Barlows and Filters
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 10-01-2005, 11:24 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
How does the Orion Ultrablock differ from the Astronomik UHC though? I don't mind paying a bit extra if it's going to be worth it.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-01-2005, 12:23 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
something to read

Bear in mind that you can get the orion filter for about half the cost if willing to buy from o/s

You've got me thinking about buying an OIII filter now

Last edited by Starkler; 10-01-2005 at 12:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-01-2005, 12:57 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
hmm good thread Geoff..

So astronomiks is the best but at almost double the price.. Orion Ultrablock is in 2nd place, not quite as good, but still good and much cheaper..

Tough call now..

Orion blocking all the h-beta line, and astronomiks letting a little through.. what will that help me to see? If it's only on a handful of objects is it worth the extra?

or.. as others have said before, buy best quality now and cry just once
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-01-2005, 01:10 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Realisticly for me, the filter just gets occasional use and a 10% improvement over a 50% saving.............

If you got the ultrablock your still getting a good filter and could put the savings to something more useful like a telrad or a good barlow etc

But hey , its your wifes job to tell you how to spend your money not mine
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-01-2005, 01:18 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Quote:
But hey , its your wifes job to tell you how to spend your money not mine
haha

yeh good points Geoff, I think i'll follow with that canadian guy and get the Ultrablock.. as you said, the left-overs can go towards something else!
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 20-01-2005, 03:02 PM
Astro_Guy
Member

Astro_Guy is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Eastern US
Posts: 31
Greetings from the Northern Hemisphere!

There is a great online article on this topic at http://pages.sbcglobal.net/raycash/filters.htm

Please note the test conditions using a 10" Newtonian. The O-III filter is more restrictive than the Narrowband/UHC/Nebustar/Ultrablock, or whatever other variants they have come up with. When buying one's first nebular filter, the narrowband variants are the logical choice. The O-III filter makes sense as a secondary nebular filter for scopes under 8-10" aperture, but begins to make sense as a single filter strategy with larger scopes.

Clear Skies,

Bob

p.s. -7C and snowing here tonight near Philadelphia
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 20-01-2005, 04:55 PM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
Bloody hell....filters are expensive....how am I going to explain them to the misses....

4 filters for $20...she will understand....
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement