Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 03-02-2008, 01:50 PM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
I remembered a post a while back on this same subject and I posted this image , by the way which agrees with the chart on the sky planatareum
Ron
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Ngc104 47Tuc.jpg)
42.5 KB14 views
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-02-2008, 03:01 PM
Tamtarn's Avatar
Tamtarn
Barb and David

Tamtarn is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Warragul. Victoria.
Posts: 2,293
Great to see some more images from the 40D Doug.

Tucanae looks good with the 300sec exposures, we must try some longer subs as our earlier image came from much shorter subs.

The Flame and Horsehead is really good and you have brought out a lot of depth in the detail of the image.

I wouldn't complain to much about Tarantula.
Our images are blue too as that is how the camera sees it.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-02-2008, 06:01 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tamtarn View Post

I wouldn't complain to much about Tarantula.
Our images are blue too as that is how the camera sees it.
Thanks B&D,
repeat after me "Must go deeper, must go deeper!!"
Cant wait till I get my WO 0.8x reducer/flattener - sort out the edge coma.
I want to push into that 10min sub territory - but there aren't enough hours in the night!!! Oh for the days of those 40x30sec exposures
I've had about 3x 3am nights in a row, got the dark circles under the eyes - starting to look like a panda...and rambling too!!!!
"Must go deeper!!!"

Doug
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-02-2008, 02:18 PM
Apocrisiary (Michael)
Registered User

Apocrisiary is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by astroron View Post
I remembered a post a while back on this same subject and I posted this image , by the way which agrees with the chart on the sky planatareum
Ron
Hi Ron, Where did that image come from? I think NGC152 is labeled incorrectly. Karlsson is spot on...a very obscure little globular, Kron 3, overshadowed by that monstrous thing next to it. It is labeled as L8 in the Millennium Star Atlas. If the field was a little larger I think Kron 7 would be a little further up above Kron 3. The field would need to be about twice as large to fit NGC152 in the field.
There is a good article by Steve Mencinsky on the ASNSW site under ASNSW Member Articles: Beyond The NGC: "For A Fistful Of Globulars". Here he says "It (Kron 3) is not particularly difficult to observe - Andrew Murrell stumbled upon it with his 10" telescope from his backyard in Woy Woy, while Mark Blackford and I were able to see it very easily (from Ilford) in his beautiful 4 inch refractor." http://www.asnsw.com/articles/bngc/bngc4.asp

Ron maybe you have been observing Kron 3 all this time and not been aware you were actually observing a 8 billion year old globular in the SMC!

Cheers,

Michael
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement