Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Observational and Visual Astronomy
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 04-02-2008, 12:11 PM
Matty P's Avatar
Matty P (Matt)
Star Struck

Matty P is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 2,797
Thumbs up

Thanks for the help guys, it is much appreciated.

I will start off with Pluto and Ceres to get my feet wet. My planetarium software confirms that Ceres is 8.7th magnitude and Pluto is 14th magnitude at the moment. It also shows 4 four other Minor Planets Pallas, Juno, Vesta and Astraea all much brighter than Pluto. (I might also add the software may be out of date, time for an upgrade)

I will be using a Celestron 8SE SCT at f/10 – 2000mm in Alt-Azimuth mode. I’m not sure how good tracking will be with the mount for a 3 minute exposure, so I might cut the exposure time down to 90-120 seconds (or less) and see how that goes. If possible I might go and pick a focal reducer for a larger FOV as well.

A few questions,

When imaging any of the Dwarf Planets, are you able to see them on the Laptop or computer screen?

If I take 5 x 90 second exposures, do I stack them all to make one image. Then wait for an interval of 1/2 hour then repeat the procedure?

Thanks for the help.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-02-2008, 12:39 PM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,824
Hi Matty

My experience with unguided long focal lengths of around 2000mm is that exposures of anything more than ¼ to ½ second will not be critically sharp due to the Earth’s rotation. Although a focal reducer will perhaps allow exposures up to maybe 1 sec without trailing, the real answer to long exposure imaging is a Polar Aligned Equatorial Mount.

Tracking in Alt-Az mode may lengthen the exposure time at the centre of the Field Of View (FOV) but other field stars will show increasing trails the further you move away from the centre.

I have an excellent German Equatorial Mount (GEM) and even when accurately polar aligned, I personally find long exposure imaging (60 secs or more) quite a challenge even when using auto guiding let alone simple tracking of the Earth’s rotation.

Anyhow, give it a go as there is nothing like practical experience to help you understand the concepts, processes and results from experimenting with what you have, before rushing out to purchase new equipment.

You should be able to see Ceres and the brighter Minor Planets on the notebook display with sub 1 second exposures. Here is an example of the effect of different length exposures using my DMK on the Trapezium. With an F12 ‘scope and an x2.5 Barlow I was working at an effective focal length of 5400mm which is around F30 for the system, albeit on a GEM whilst tracking (not guiding).

Cheers

Dennis
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Trapezium collage text lines.jpg)
138.2 KB9 views
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-02-2008, 12:59 PM
Matty P's Avatar
Matty P (Matt)
Star Struck

Matty P is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 2,797
Thanks again Dennis,

I will give it a go and see what I can get.

All I need now is clear skies.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement