Dave, Pluto is one of my fave objects - a long time ago (in a galaxy far away) some friends and I used to like to do allnighter '9 planet marathons' from a dark sky site and I looked at Pluto often in my 8" eits dob I had at the time (wish I had never sold that one) and in the end I really thought that Pluto looked different to stars - the stars are a rather diamond hard light point - but to me Pluto had a sort of a bit softer (typically planetlike) pastelly look to it? I have called it a chalky pearl before. Anyone else agree with me - or am i just stark raving mad?
Just to make for being off topic - i have been following a great thread on comets-ml and there is much discussion on what instrument is appropriate for a correct scientific visual observation/magnitude of this comet - the verdict seems to be for large aperture binos at the mo - with which some people are getting a size of up to 7 arc minutes diameter apparently.
Sorry i am no good at the snappy, terse, minimalist replies that are all the rage it appears. - or is that just good nettiquette?
Longwinded is the only style i know so far

i am not a typical laconic Ozzie as you can see.
Kearn
Madder than mad Jack McMad