Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 5.00 average.
  #21  
Old 28-04-2005, 03:36 PM
frogman's Avatar
frogman (Anthony Lord)
Host to the Stars

frogman is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Canberra (used to be Kulnura)
Posts: 531
There you go Thiink
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (fan.jpg)
46.4 KB108 views
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 28-04-2005, 03:50 PM
Thiink
Registered User

Thiink is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bathurst, NSW
Posts: 330
Thanks mate. Any chance of one taken a bit further back?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 28-04-2005, 04:07 PM
frogman's Avatar
frogman (Anthony Lord)
Host to the Stars

frogman is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Canberra (used to be Kulnura)
Posts: 531
yeah youll notice a reddish ring around part of the pic thats where the power plug is supposed to be seated... but the supplied nut and bolts came loose and now i've lost them
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (dscf0075.jpg)
47.4 KB107 views
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 28-04-2005, 04:24 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
thanks, now can you take it off and put it on my scope?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 28-04-2005, 04:30 PM
frogman's Avatar
frogman (Anthony Lord)
Host to the Stars

frogman is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Canberra (used to be Kulnura)
Posts: 531
its only an 80mm computer case fan with a male felale end onit
make one reall easy
Do you want one made for when you come on the 7th
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 28-04-2005, 04:30 PM
Thiink
Registered User

Thiink is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bathurst, NSW
Posts: 330
Excellent, thanks Anthony! I was thinking of building something similar for my 10".

A question for you dew experts, would it be better mounting a fan under the mirror mount as in the above pics, or mounting the fan onto some form of board/"plug" (which would require bigger mirror-locking bolts) to force the fan to draw air from inside the tube/around the mirror, as in stringscope's setup on the first page.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 28-04-2005, 04:34 PM
frogman's Avatar
frogman (Anthony Lord)
Host to the Stars

frogman is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Canberra (used to be Kulnura)
Posts: 531
no idea mate.... that setup works for me and you know the old saying,
"If it aint broke......."

Anthony
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 28-04-2005, 05:18 PM
ausastronomer (John Bambury)
Registered User

ausastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven Heads, NSW
Posts: 2,620
Quote:
Originally posted by iceman
Excellent points Ian.. I'll definitely have to make a dew shield/tube extension for my dob.

What can be done about dew on the primary mirror?
Mike,

I have a dew shield that I made that extends my tube by 320mm. It does an excellent job as a dew shield and also as a light baffle. Ian indicates the tube should extend past the secondary by at least 1 x the scopes aperture. That is consistent with my thoughts as well being that the tube should extend somewhere between 1 and 1.5 x the scopes aperture past the secondary. My secondary only dews under the most unfavourable conditions and even then it takes an awfully long time for the secondary to dew up. I actually forgot to take my dewshield with me to the April mini star party, you could have had a look at it and judged how effective it is. I really think it a better option than a secondary heater for several reasons including those that Ian mentioned.

In addition to the dew shield there are sound practices you can follow that also delay the onset of secondary dewing.

1. Return the scope to the horizontal position when its not in use.

2. Cap the focuser when you remove an eyepiece. A 35mm film cannister works well for this. Keep the cannister in your pocket and drop it in when you remove the eyepiece.

CS- John B
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 28-04-2005, 05:36 PM
ausastronomer (John Bambury)
Registered User

ausastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven Heads, NSW
Posts: 2,620
Quote:
Originally posted by Thiink
Excellent, thanks Anthony! I was thinking of building something similar for my 10".

A question for you dew experts, would it be better mounting a fan under the mirror mount as in the above pics, or mounting the fan onto some form of board/"plug" (which would require bigger mirror-locking bolts) to force the fan to draw air from inside the tube/around the mirror, as in stringscope's setup on the first page.
Simon,

Anthony's is a factory fitted blowing fan. There are 2 schools of thought as to whether the fan should blow on the primary or draw air down the tube. The majority of factory installed fans including the GSO dobs "blow" on the primary. I have an older GSO 10" dob to which I have installed a fan and it blows on the primary. My primary mirror cell has a steel cover plate and I have attached the fan to this. The newer scopes have a different mirror cell without the steel protection plate. I removed the plate to allow the scope to cool faster when I didn't have a fan but used the plate as a convenient method to mount the fan when I decided to stick a fan on it. I used a 12V DC 90cm brushless ball bearing fan from DSE ($20).

I am also in the process of fitting a 12V "air pump" to the scope to gently blow air around the face of the primary to "lift the boundary layer" I probably won't have this finished for another 2 weeks or so. I will post some pics of the entire setup when I have it finished. There has been a large amount of literature over the years about "removing the boundary layer" in tubed newtonians and I am convinced the results can only be positive.

If you care to post some digicam pics of the mirror end of the scope I can advise you about the best way to mount a fan to it.

CS-John B
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 28-04-2005, 06:59 PM
Thiink
Registered User

Thiink is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bathurst, NSW
Posts: 330
Thanks for the reply ausastronomer. I've never noticed it before, but there is already mounting holes for an 80mm fan. The original question is still valid though, should I just mount a fan to that and blow onto the mirror, or should I surround the fan and draw air from the tube.

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 28-04-2005, 11:37 PM
ausastronomer (John Bambury)
Registered User

ausastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven Heads, NSW
Posts: 2,620
Quote:
Originally posted by Thiink
Thanks for the reply ausastronomer. I've never noticed it before, but there is already mounting holes for an 80mm fan. The original question is still valid though, should I just mount a fan to that and blow onto the mirror, or should I surround the fan and draw air from the tube.

Thanks.

I would get an 80mm Fan from DSE and just mount it to those mounting holes and blow air onto the mirror. The idea of this is to cool the mirror faster so that it reaches thermal equilibrium and the images stabilise more rapidly. This wont help the dew issue and to alleviate that i would mount an extension tube/dew shield to the front of the scope as Ian and I both discussed in an earlier post.

CS-John B
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 28-04-2005, 11:52 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
What some have done is to fashion a ring which seals against the inner wall of the OTA and with a hole with a diameter to just cover the primary mirror clips. This can give three possible advantages.

1: Channeling of the air from a fan behind the mirror to scour the warm air barrier layer from the mirror surface.

2: Act as a mask to hide any possible turned edge on the primary mirror.

3: Remove diffraction noise contributed by the mirror clips.

(None of this has anything to do with secondary dewing).
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 29-04-2005, 06:10 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Geoff can you post any pics of something like that done? I've read about it before but am having difficulty "seeing" it.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 29-04-2005, 06:22 AM
ausastronomer (John Bambury)
Registered User

ausastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven Heads, NSW
Posts: 2,620
Mike,

I have 1 fitted to my scope so I can show you exactly what it is. The only difference being, mine has a slightly larger aperture than the baffle Geoff is talking about. I installed mine purely as a light baffle hence the slightly larger aperture. I previously had installed a mask exactly as Geoff described but subsequently removed it as it caused an issue with tube currents but at the time I did not have the cooling fan installed. I may have a fiddle there again and see what effect the sub aperture mask has in conjunction with the cooling fan and the boundary layer air pump, that may just all work nicely actually with 2 air sources helping to move the tube currents.

CS-John B
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 29-04-2005, 08:29 PM
Thiink
Registered User

Thiink is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bathurst, NSW
Posts: 330
Quote:
Originally posted by ausastronomer
I would get an 80mm Fan from DSE and just mount it to those mounting holes and blow air onto the mirror. The idea of this is to cool the mirror faster so that it reaches thermal equilibrium and the images stabilise more rapidly. This wont help the dew issue and to alleviate that i would mount an extension tube/dew shield to the front of the scope as Ian and I both discussed in an earlier post.

CS-John B
I'm going for a drive to DSE tomorrow (I have to go to Orange, they closed our DSE down here in Bathurst.. ). Whats the best way to feed the fan the required 12v? I could use one of the DSE 8x AA battery holders and use rechargeable batteries, but that only gives off 9.6v. I know the fans work on lower voltages, albeit at slower speeds, but is that going to be enough to cause enough CFM to be useful? What size/quantity of batteries does the factory fan use? I noticed the Orion branded fan/battery packs run 8x D sized batteries, ouch!

The only other thing I am going to need is a plug so I can disconnect the fan so I don't eventually crush the wires when I sit the tube on the floor inside the house while I am packing up.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 29-04-2005, 09:29 PM
RAJAH235's Avatar
RAJAH235
A very 'Senior' member.

RAJAH235 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South Coast N.S.W.
Posts: 2,571
Simon, you can get a 12 volt 4 ah Gel Cell,(jaycar part#sb-2484 @ $35.00),which will power the fan for days. It's a small compact battery. The fan runs on about 150 ma., but of course you don't use it all night. As for plugs etc, use a DC plug/socket. eg; part # pp-0511 (2.5 mm female plug) $1.55, & part # ps-0528 (2.5 mm male inline socket). $2.45. or if you want to mount the socket on a bracket, use > part #ps-0524 Bulkhead male. $2.65.
HTH. L.

Last edited by RAJAH235; 29-04-2005 at 09:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 30-04-2005, 09:28 AM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Quote:
Originally posted by ausastronomer
Mike,

I previously had installed a mask exactly as Geoff described but subsequently removed it as it caused an issue with tube currents but at the time I did not have the cooling fan installed. I may have a fiddle there again and see what effect the sub aperture mask has in conjunction with the cooling fan and the boundary layer air pump,
CS-John B
John I recall a discussion on one of the yahoo groups about this and I raised the concern about having to run the fan all the time without a choice due to tube currents entering the light path.
The reply was that a sub aperture mask isnt required and just needs to be big enough to direct air toward the upper edge of the mirror to create turbulence and it will give the desired effect.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 30-04-2005, 09:51 AM
ausastronomer (John Bambury)
Registered User

ausastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven Heads, NSW
Posts: 2,620
Quote:
Originally posted by Starkler
A sub aperture mask isnt required and just needs to be big enough to direct air toward the upper edge of the mirror to create turbulence and it will give the desired effect.
Geoff,

I am aware of that but I want to try the sub aperture mask to eliminate the diffraction noise off the mirror clips, I already have the problem solved for the boundary layer.

CS-John B

Last edited by ausastronomer; 30-04-2005 at 09:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 30-04-2005, 10:29 AM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
I'll be very interested to hear about the results.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-05-2005, 06:14 PM
bytor666
Cygnus X-1

bytor666 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 366
here's my fan on the back of my 12" gso scope. I then put a round piece of "foamie" on the back to keep stray light out.
I tested the fan about 2 weeks ago & it ran on USED batteries for 7 hours!!!!!
--------------------------------
Mark
12" gso scope
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (back.jpg)
31.3 KB40 views
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement