Quote:
Originally Posted by matt
Hi Dennis
By this do you mean one would have to go from one to the other making (hopefully) ever-decreasing fine adjustments until the polar alignment is spot on?
Cheers 
|
Hi Matt
I have never drift aligned, so what follows are my theoretical musings on the topic from trying to grapple with it in a mental model – the Tak has an excellent Polar Alignment ‘Scope.
If we start out with our mount level, then our polar axis may be misaligned in altitude, azimuth or both.
An Altitude misalignment is when the mount’s polar axis is off in altitude, pointing either N or S of the true pole. With the mount misaligned in altitude relative to SCP:
Polar Axis too high? Star drifts South.
Polar Axis too low? Star drifts North.
In this case, the star is a bright star in the East, about 15 degrees above the Horizon, near the Celestial Equator.
An Azimuth misalignment is when the mount’s polar axis is off in azimuth, pointing either E or W of the true pole. With the mount misaligned in Azimuth relative to SCP:
Polar Axis too far East? Star drifts North.
Polar Axis too far West? Star drifts South.
In this case, the star is a bright star near the intersection of the Meridian and the Celestial Equator.
With drift alignment, I believe you never compensate for drift in RA, you only watch out for movements in DEC.
If the mount is not level, when you make an adjustment in say Altitude, you will also be making an adjustment in the Azimuth axis as well, so I presume the overall task becomes more difficult, possibly requiring more iterations?
Hope that helps
Cheers
Dennis