Hi,
I’m leaving the names out of the quote below, from an earlier post on this thread, because we should discuss the topic and not the person. It could be satire but it might not be.
Jokes, satire, sarcasm, real-thoughts all get interpreted and propagated. Without any factual information about the glass object in question, readers may see that
prima facie one country was immediately labelled with presumptions, accusations, fear-induced words. Suppose the OP’s glass object might possibly be related to the UK as appeared in a later post, is it all alright then? No issue, no intent, no hate, no fear, the UK isn’t taking over the whole world in a global onslaught, not to be nuked back to the stone age?
[QUOTE ]It's a brilliant invention from ....
...
Prima facia evidence of capability and intent that these chaps will take over the world with their dastardly cunning. ... Nuke 'em back to the stone age while we still stand a chance against the global onslaught of their trebuchets, I say![/QUOTE]
When it’s a joke please make clear; but why joke at the expense of others’ pain?! Please, let us especially in this science-related forum observe
freedom of respectful and rational speech. It’s not about gagging speech but speech points to the mind and speech can be a horrid weapon. The US Holocaust Memorial Museum apparently expressed a few days ago, “The holocaust did not begin with killing.
It began with words”. Other discussions stated how citizens of Germany were “
taught to despise”.
Jokes or no. They carry. Consciously or subconsciously, people ASSOCIATE these words with certain features, then stereotype, re-associate, apply selective statistics, and escalate. There are consequences! There are school kids bullied. There are citizens and visitors and investors suffering. There are people killed, and horribly so. No good just blaming ‘just a mad person’ for a crime (when it’s one of ‘us’, but blaming the whole country/religion/colour/continent/the-lot when it’s one of ‘them’), words spread, hate spreads, stereotypes spread. Also, even if acceptance-of-other-human-beings is not practiced, do we expect NO retaliation??
Sure speaking up is uncomfortable. Should bystanders do nothing? See #makeitawkward. For world peace’s sake, please.
In any case, we all know Carl Sagan’s take.
And back to the OP’s topic…… Anything else please kindly start a new thread.
Cheers