Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiraz
pretty fine result for that level of seeing. Your processing has brought out some excellent detail in the core region and the transition to the lower res outer regions is not noticeable.
|
Thanks very much Ray! It was a bit of work teasing out the detail though and keeping it looking real. My kingdom for a few nights of good seeing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flugel88
Nice Antennae Marcus.
Shame about the seeing it has been terrible up in Newcastle area for me too  .
some Nights i can't even guide with stars bouncing around like crazy and there have been lots of nights with high thin cloud cover.
I hope you can get some good data to polish your image off before it gets to late in the season. |
Cheers Michael. If I don't get a chance during the next lunar cycle it will be next year.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rex
That's a fine result Marcus, especially since you tossed most a lot of the data. Man I wish I had seeing like yours, if I made my cut off at 2.5 fwhm, I wouldn't have any sub's to stack lol. That's the trouble with living up here, always warm and humid. Looking forward to seeing the end result.
|
Thanks a lot Rex! The best seeing I get around here is 1.7 arcsec FWHM and that's quite rare. 2.0 is much more common. Boy, what I wouldn't give for some altitude and less humidity!
