Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 16-10-2006, 07:06 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis
However, visually, at the same magnification, the bigger light bucket will make the galaxy appear brighter if your eye can accommodate the full exit pupil of the eyepiece.
To expand on this, if you have the same exit pupil size (aperture/mag) any size scope will show the galaxy at the same brightness (assuming transmission losses are equal), but at a bigger image scale (smaller fov) in the larger scope.

The limiting factor of course is the maximum size that your pupil can dilate to when dark adapted.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 16-10-2006, 08:51 PM
astroboy's Avatar
astroboy
Registered User

astroboy is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lake Bathurst NSW
Posts: 702
Most this sounds fine for extended objects but back in the film days it was understood for stars aperture is the main thing , this is why I had to expose a 20 mm F5.6 shot for 90min on film to get enough stars for a good milky way shot.
I dont think CCD makes much differance but if you take the focal length too far the stars may behave like extended objects.

Zane
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement