Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 04-10-2015, 12:42 PM
Hitmangwp (Grahame)
Registered User

Hitmangwp is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Finch hatton Queensland
Posts: 5
I've decided to save up for a 13mm ETHOS .
A question about Filters.
Can't find much info to split the OIII from the UHC.
Any thoughts or is it a personal choice ?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-10-2015, 11:21 AM
SkyWatch (Dean)
Registered User

SkyWatch is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 403
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitmangwp View Post
I've decided to save up for a 13mm ETHOS .
A question about Filters.
Can't find much info to split the OIII from the UHC.
Any thoughts or is it a personal choice ?
I prefer the UHC because it gives you a more "natural" field. For me it is more aesthetically pleasing, and lends itself to viewing more objects. The OIII is very high contrast for emission nebulae, but tends to block out everything else. They complement each other, but if was choosing just one I would go for the UHC.

The Astronomik website gives a good comparison with transmission graphs: http://www.astronomik.com/en/visual-filters.html

All the best,

Dean
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-10-2015, 11:50 AM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
The OIII and UHC are different creatures, made for different purposes.
For general night to night purposes it is hard to go past the Lumicon
Deep Sky Filter. The Lumicon website has information on the usefulness
of many filter types and colours, for various objects.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-01-2016, 12:16 PM
GaryA
Registered User

GaryA is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitmangwp View Post
Hi guys.
Just bought myself a CPC 800 GPS XLT Computerised Telescope.
I understand it comes with a basic eye pieces.
So my question is what extra eye pieces should I be looking at to get the best from this Telescope.
This is my first Telescope and I want to get the most out of it.
Thanks.
Hi Hitman,
I went to Singapore Scientific and the Gentleman there said my Lens where very adequate. I have come home with my tail between my legs ( not really, but in deep thought, yes) but more determined to try harder with what I got in my bag of tricks. As Raymo suggested EPs are a personal choice. So I have since been back learnt a bit about the area I live and quality of light and the best time to search the Skies. I have also found that using my 40mm EP I do at times get some really fine views of nebula's , star clusters etc.
The DBK CCD has arrived but have not attempted to use it as the planets and conditions are not the best for viewing at the present moment.
With the Atmosphere or sky conditions, there is days in daylight hrs you can see that show a deep blue sky and I have found these skies to very ideal to star gaze at night. Has anyone noticed that?
New Years Eve was such a day but about 8 PM the winds picked and were very gusty. There ends my night of viewing! Although the viewing around the Orion Nebula was very clear once the winds dropped down for a few minutes.
Also viewing in my light polluted area is that bad!
It is only on occasions and late at night I get quite good detail through my scope and in virtually directly above position.
I only can wish to be able to take my scope into the non polluted areas in the country on a good night but maybe later on I will try that on one or 2 occasions. I say 1 or two occasion as I have time restraints with work and other commitments.
As I have been told I need to steady down and just observe. That's the fun of it. I really feel the heckles work out on the back of my neck when I view a new something. I also keep a diary. One of the easiest things that has helped me is downloading Stellarium and hitching my scope up to that.
This helps a lot because you can see where you are going and also knowing what you are looking at, without just dialing something up on the GPS and travelling a full circle to get to it. To me that is like a cat chasing its tail. Also you have good capabilities to learn where the stars and constellations are in the sky very much easier.
To keep everyone in the loop I have a Large flat screen TV with HI PIXELLING connected to my Laptop and that is for those who want to see what I am looking at which I can pick up with my Canon 700D. This is housed in my out room in the observatory.
Just before I finish- I thought why bother about Constellations and others but really your knowledge of the skies grows so much quicker and can picture things much quicker when having a look up there to see where the constellations and nebula are.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement