Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 06-06-2015, 01:05 PM
Logieberra's Avatar
Logieberra (Logan)
Registered User

Logieberra is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,644
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spookyer View Post
Yes mate, the $$ stack up fast with the big rig mono cameras. I might even give the D4 a run for a while with it while I save up. Gotta recover from the RC-12 and FSQ purchase first.
No harm done there. Give the Nikon a good run before going whole hog into mono. I love my full-frame Canon 6D on the FSQ.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-06-2015, 01:30 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Here's my take on it.

FSQ106 and KAF8300 work well in the good seeing I have. All my images taken with this combo look pretty good out of the camera. However, the field of view is a little small for what I would like.

I am contemplating putting the STXL on the FSQ and imaging with that after I buy a 6303E for the RC. That will provide a good happy medium for both scopes. The flattener I have right now for the RC cannot seem to correct for a large sensor but the next one down would be fine.

Ideally, I want the STXL11 on the FSQ now, but it will have to wait. If I was in your position that is what I would do right now if you had the money. With your budget right now, then a 8300 will work and produce good images.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-06-2015, 09:14 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,185
STL11 and FSQ were always a great match when I used that setup.

There are plenty of nice KAF8300/FSQ images around at the moment. As Paul says that is a nice setup. I imagine the 8300 FOV is taking the sharpness of the optics to the limit.

Starlight Express Trius 694 or 814 would also be a good match. Perhaps the 814 (QSI 690 would be ideal as filter wheel and OAG all together).

That would be slightly better sampling but I don't think its that vital with an FSQ. Sampling seems more important with longer focal length scopes.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement