Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 24-07-2015, 09:43 AM
rustigsmed's Avatar
rustigsmed (Russell)
Registered User

rustigsmed is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Australia
Posts: 3,997
Quote:
Originally Posted by vlazg View Post
This is an image taken with a saxon ed 120 using the same camera, the stars are now much better.
Could the problem with the WO FLT 110 be a collimation issue somewhere in the image train, either the lenses or the focuser or both? If so is there somewhere to send it, i don't have the confidence or the knowhow to do it myself.
George
hi George I think you need to take a few shots of objects higher in the sky away from the horizon to rule out atmospheric chromatic aberration with your scope. I've got a feeling that was what your problem was I think you mentioned it was quite low.

Russ
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 24-07-2015, 10:15 AM
vlazg's Avatar
vlazg (George)
Registered User

vlazg is offline
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Darwin
Posts: 737
Thanks Russ,
The new image is of the Butterfly Cluster, and it was of a similar altitude to the olde one.
I recently posted an image of the Triffid taken with the WO and up close he stars are showing the same aberration
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (triffid.jpg)
60.1 KB44 views
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 24-07-2015, 01:18 PM
rustigsmed's Avatar
rustigsmed (Russell)
Registered User

rustigsmed is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Australia
Posts: 3,997
Quote:
Originally Posted by vlazg View Post
Thanks Russ,
The new image is of the Butterfly Cluster, and it was of a similar altitude to the olde one.
I recently posted an image of the Triffid taken with the WO and up close he stars are showing the same aberration
ok sorry George its past my level of knowledge now - I don't use refractors - but sounds like it could be the scope, good luck I hope you get to the bottom of it soon
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 24-07-2015, 02:40 PM
vlazg's Avatar
vlazg (George)
Registered User

vlazg is offline
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Darwin
Posts: 737
Quote:
Originally Posted by rustigsmed View Post
ok sorry George its past my level of knowledge now - I don't use refractors - but sounds like it could be the scope, good luck I hope you get to the bottom of it soon
thanks mate, you've been really helpful
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 24-07-2015, 03:44 PM
willik (Willik)
Registered User

willik is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 717
Willik

Looks like your are out of focus and there was dew on your mirror halos
around the stars
Willik
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 24-07-2015, 05:13 PM
vlazg's Avatar
vlazg (George)
Registered User

vlazg is offline
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Darwin
Posts: 737
Quote:
Originally Posted by willik View Post
Looks like your are out of focus and there was dew on your mirror halos
around the stars
Willik
I am using a refractor, no mirror, no dew that night.
I also used a Bhatinov mask, with the Bhatinov grabber in sharp cap, and focusing was as good as i could do

Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 25-07-2015, 01:19 PM
willik (Willik)
Registered User

willik is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 717
willik

Don't rely on the mask do fine focus the lowest numbers count and it could be condensation on your camera chip.
Willik
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 26-07-2015, 01:43 AM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Post #22 looks like CA to me.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 26-07-2015, 08:46 PM
vlazg's Avatar
vlazg (George)
Registered User

vlazg is offline
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Darwin
Posts: 737
Quote:
Originally Posted by cometcatcher View Post
Post #22 looks like CA to me.
Thanks Kevin, with my limited experience i think the same, is this what an apo triplet should do? i have seen other pics taken with an flt 110 and this does not seem to be the case, is this correctible?
George
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 26-07-2015, 09:39 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Quote:
Originally Posted by vlazg View Post
Thanks Kevin, with my limited experience i think the same, is this what an apo triplet should do? i have seen other pics taken with an flt 110 and this does not seem to be the case, is this correctible?
George
Hi George, I don't have any direct experience with that scope so I'm not familiar with it. If they are blue stars it may not be CA at all?

I have two ED refractors, a fast Kson ED80 at F5.5 and the Skywatcher ED100 at F9. The ED80 has noticeable CA, the ED100 has to be pushed hard for it to show. I have a bunch of achro refractors at various F ratios which of course all have CA.

A Baader Semi-Apo filter will probably help a little. I've found it to be beneficial on the ED80.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement