NGC6188 20 hours with total reprocess

[RickS (Rick)]

I like the repro a lot better, Paul

[RobF (Rob)]

Repro Like +1

The first image was interesting for the bits of red and blue shown below the "dragons", but no.3 has much more impact on the eye.

[multiweb (Marc)]

Last repro's on the money. Star profiles are good.

[Placidus (Mike and Trish)]

For exploring the finest detail, for example the tight cluster around the brightest star, or those OIII rings nearby, I slightly prefer the darker penultimate version.

As an image to blow up to A1 and put on the wall, the final repro is superb. A warmer, more inviting feel, without losing any impact.

Overall, the final one has it.

[Paul Haese]

Thanks guys for the comments on the repro.

Originally Posted by Placidus

For exploring the finest detail, for example the tight cluster around the brightest star, or those OIII rings nearby, I slightly prefer the darker penultimate version.

As an image to blow up to A1 and put on the wall, the final repro is superb. A warmer, more inviting feel, without losing any impact.

Overall, the final one has it.

Thanks Mike. I usually wait for a day or two when publishing and just see how things fit with me, but I was in a rush and yet another lesson learnt with patience to process. I will examine this version more closely to see what can be improved with it before moving onto the next project which is being collected right now. Its been a busy month with 4 images completed. The objects I am on now though might take some time to collect all the data.

[gregbradley]

Nice repro Paul. Looks better.

Greg.

[Paul Haese]

Originally Posted by gregbradley

Nice repro Paul. Looks better.

Greg.

Looks better? What would you like to see improved?

[gregbradley]

NB is largely.subjective hence no real valid comment.
But it would probably improve the image to.make the stars recede more and a better balance between light and dark.
As I say its subjective and not a valid criticism free really
Greg