Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 12-04-2015, 08:02 PM
Stevec35 (Steve)
Registered User

Stevec35 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,654
Wow - like that a lot Fred and the SII really adds to the result.

Cheers

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-04-2015, 08:09 PM
Placidus (Mike and Trish)
Narrowing the band

Placidus is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Euchareena, NSW
Posts: 3,719
Fred, your depth of SII is spectacular. Our shot is in NII, not SII.

I've tried hard to get a handle on where you'd see the one and not the other. Both are forbidden transitions, meaning they are only seen in extremely attenuated gas. Both require hard UV (or, perhaps and not relevant here, shock energy) to excite them, so they both need OB stars around. But nitrogen is produced earlier in nucleosynthesis than sulfur, so there might be more NII around in the absence of supernovas to dredge up really deep stuff. Having said that, the similarity between your SII and our NII distribution is very, very close. Almost exact. I think that's reassuring for both of us.

Superb result, Fred.

Best,
Mike and Trish
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-04-2015, 09:00 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by Placidus View Post
Fred, your depth of SII is spectacular. Our shot is in NII, not SII.

I've tried hard to get a handle on where you'd see the one and not the other. Both are forbidden transitions, meaning they are only seen in extremely attenuated gas. Both require hard UV (or, perhaps and not relevant here, shock energy) to excite them, so they both need OB stars around. But nitrogen is produced earlier in nucleosynthesis than sulfur, so there might be more NII around in the absence of supernovas to dredge up really deep stuff. Having said that, the similarity between your SII and our NII distribution is very, very close. Almost exact. I think that's reassuring for both of us.

Superb result, Fred.

Best,
Mike and Trish
Thanks Mike n Trish.
Makes me wonder then that I should always look for NII whenever I cant find SII , just in case,as a substitute.

Did you find NII brighter than SII on Thor?.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-04-2015, 09:18 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
The detail Fred kicks butt as you stated on my little FSQ version. I sort of like the version with the green which could be moderated a little I think, but again this is all dealers choice. I am not keen on a purple cast to this target though. You still have lots of choices though I think. The original is still a nice image.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 16-04-2015, 09:49 AM
gvanhau's Avatar
gvanhau (Geert)
Registered User

gvanhau is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Santiago, Chile
Posts: 203
I like the colors.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 17-04-2015, 02:39 PM
CoolhandJo's Avatar
CoolhandJo (Paul)
Registered User

CoolhandJo is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,816
Very nice Fred.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement