Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 01-12-2014, 07:55 PM
Shiraz's Avatar
Shiraz (Ray)
Registered User

Shiraz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ardrossan south australia
Posts: 4,918
Like Fred, ZX81 (kit imported from UK before they were available here) - modified the RF coil to suit and designed and built a RAM upgrade card to get from 1k to 5k of ram (bit hazy now, but I think that the video display pinched a bit of the 1k RAM, so it was a bit tight as supplied). Magic - light years ahead of a Marchant.

Last edited by Shiraz; 01-12-2014 at 08:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-12-2014, 08:08 PM
Glenhuon (Bill)
Registered User

Glenhuon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Geraldton, WA
Posts: 1,440
First one I had a play with was my mates Sinclair Z80. Later bought a C64 (for the kids ), with tape drive for loading games, spent hours writing programs in basic, even had one used by the local special school to teach the kids arithmetic. Next one was a 286 "portable" 2 x 3 1/4" floppies, weighed about the same as a middy tower Pentium.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-12-2014, 08:19 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,280
Trash 80 for me
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-12-2014, 08:24 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
The first computer I used was a DEC PDP-10. First one I owned was a 386 PC. Wasn't much point in buying a toy micro in between when I was used to big iron

I did spend quite a lot of time disassembling, reverse engineering and rewriting the "OS" on Tandy TRS80s and Exidy Sorcerers but I got paid for that...
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-12-2014, 08:40 PM
sheeny's Avatar
sheeny (Al)
Spam Hunter

sheeny is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oberon NSW
Posts: 14,438
Mine was a 32k MicroBee, with a cassette drive, which I later upgraded to a 64k "Chook in a Book", which, like Shane I still have! ;o)

I used to be a member of SMUG (Sydney MicroBee User's Group) and NMUG (Newcastle MicroBee User's Group). We're you in either of those Shane?

Al.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-12-2014, 09:13 PM
grasshopper's Avatar
grasshopper (Tara)
Registered User

grasshopper is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 17
As an 80's child, I remember our Commodore 64 as being our first. Loved Summer/Winter games! I have some C64 floppy disks that have content on that I have not seen and would love to find out what is on them but have not come across a functional C64.

There is a pretty neat exhibition at ACMI at Fed Square that showcases some old computers/consoles - it encouraged me to whip out the old Original NES!
https://www.acmi.net.au/exhibitions/screen-worlds/
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-12-2014, 09:34 PM
gary
Registered User

gary is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Mt. Kuring-Gai
Posts: 5,999
I was lucky to own a programmable HP-25 calculator in 1975.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HP-25

However, the first real computer I owned was a Motorola D2 Kit in 1976.

It was an evaluation board that Motorola had introduced for its 6800 microprocessor (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motorola_6800)
and came with 128 bytes of static RAM (yes, that's bytes) and 1KB of EPROM.
The CPU could run at 1MHz but from memory was clocked at 512KHz.

It came in a large folder along with documentation :-
http://allardschaap.woelmuis.nl/comp...la/6800map.jpg

You soldered it together yourself and it included seven segment LEDs,
a keypad and a cassette interface running the Kansas City Standard.

You programmed in machine code in hexadecimal and I spent countless
hours creating programs and punching them in. What simultaneously got
programmed was my own brain as I can still cite many of the
6800 opcodes off-by-heart. 0x86 - Load A immediate,
0x7E - Jump extended, 0xCE load index register and so on. As useless
as still remembering your very first phone number.

Anyway, this computer had a profound impact and a little over a decade
later I found myself sitting in Silicon Valley in front of much more powerful
graphic workstations creating the test vectors for my first custom
integrated circuit.

The coolest computers I ever owned, which incidentally ran incredibly hot, were
a couple of Apollo DN1000 Personal Supercomputers.
See http://jim.rees.org/apollo-archive/m...hure_Jul88.pdf

This same model computer was in use at CERN alongside their Crays.

64-bit RISC multi-processors with fabulous graphics. About 1000 were
made.

One of the oddest computers I ever worked with was the Intel iAPX 432.
It was Intel's first 32-bit architecture and were originally meant to
be the architecture that was to follow the 8008 and 8080.

The chipset included some of the largest integrated circuits ever designed
up to that time and only a very small number were ever made.

The instruction set was variable length and somewhat incredibly, bit
aligned.

Instructions could range from 6 bits to 361 bits long.

However, the programming language of choice for them was Ada.

Suffice to say they ran very slowly.

They were sufficiently complex to understand that the Intel
engineering documentation often resorted to using comic strips
to help succinctly convey some of the more subtle concepts.

Our primary research focus with them was fault tolerant computing.

A team at NASA who were also studying them for possible use on a then
future space station made up a significant part of a tiny user group.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-12-2014, 09:34 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,473
IBM 1130.....I but it wasn't mine. The guys at IBM let me play with it after school in 1972. Used to write program's in Pascal.

The first one I owned was an Amiga 1000.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-12-2014, 09:47 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by gary View Post
The coolest computers I ever owned, which incidentally ran incredibly hot, were
a couple of Apollo DN1000 Personal Supercomputers.
See http://jim.rees.org/apollo-archive/m...hure_Jul88.pdf
The DN10000s were serious beasts, Gary. I was working for Apollo when they were released.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 01-12-2014, 10:05 PM
astronobob's Avatar
astronobob (Bob)
Casual Cosmos Capturer

astronobob is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Gold Coast SE QLD
Posts: 4,469
was a late entry into puutas, I worked in the building/concrete circles, most technical equipment I had during the turn of the century was an Electric Ciggerete lighter, (Bic)
think early 2000'ishwas my 1st puuta, hence , an acer desktop, with 40gig harddrive, not sure how much ramm, prop 1/2 gig or 256k ?
Spent like 6-9 months getting my head around Windows
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 01-12-2014, 10:06 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
No one has mentioned the Tandy COCO's yet? I had the colour 16K version from 1982 onwards. Upgraded it to 64K. Had so much fun with that thing.

Took a break from computers in the mid - late 80's and then in 1992 bought a 386SX with 2 meg of RAM and a 40 meg hard drive. Cost me about $1800! The main reason for buying was to get into digital astrophotography. I had Richard Berry's book that came with a 5" floppy full of images taken with an ST-4. It was all downhill from there lol.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 01-12-2014, 10:13 PM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,735
First computer used was a PDP at the local College/Uni - BASIC and paper cards.

First computer owned, the C64 - first with tape, then a floppy drive with 160K of memory (I think)
Couldn't believe it first time I saw Flight Simulator running on a 64k computer. Used to spend hours and hours writing 6502 assembly code for it and the sound chip.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 01-12-2014, 10:58 PM
gary
Registered User

gary is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Mt. Kuring-Gai
Posts: 5,999
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS View Post
The DN10000s were serious beasts, Gary. I was working for Apollo when they were released.
Hi Rick,

It's a small world!

We also used DN3000's, DN4000's, DN3500's and 425t's.

Still retain some as a collection.

Working with the Apollo's in the 80's and early 90's was arguably
one of the best and most productive computing environments I have
ever enjoyed.

The networking was integral to the operating system and as luck would
have it, network access speeds and disk access speeds in those days
were closely matched on these machines so when you had a network
of them, you had one big hierarchical file system that was pretty fast.

To this day I can't understand why we are stuck with SMB, AFS
and NFS. How could such second-rate networking architectures have won?

Plus the Display Manager and integrated text editor just kicked-ass.
Transcript pads that were effectively infinitely long. Really nicely
thought-out.

In collaborative engineering environments, they were amazingly productive.
We would run DSEE and when you would do a build it would use all the
machines on the network you had nominated to perform the compiles.

At three companies I worked for we used Mentor Graphics CAD
software on them.

At one company here in Sydney, I was assigned their first DN3000
along with about $120,000 of CAD software on it in the mid-1980's.
Though the company had about 400 employees, for a time I was the
only one using a mouse and a 19" colour graphics terminal.

It was such an eye-opening thing at the time that visitors
given the corporate tour would be shown it. It would be explained to them
that "this is called a mouse" and "this is a windowing system".

I recollect at the time going to a tradeshow with a colleague and Apple
had just released their very first Macintosh. We played with it briefly
and having been so spoilt by the Apollo workstations we turned and looked
at each other and involuntarily both burst out in laughter. It was
just a tiny tinker toy.

But fast forward to 2014 and Apple had the last laugh with the largest
market capitalization in the world. But despite that, I still look back at
the Apollo's and they had features sadly lacking in Mac OS X to this day.

Did you ever get to travel to the Apollo factory in Chelmsford?
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 02-12-2014, 06:22 AM
ZeroID's Avatar
ZeroID (Brent)
Lost in Space ....

ZeroID is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 4,949
First use - PDP 11e with paper tape inbut and basic.
First PC 386 AT with green screen.
Amiga 500 upgraded to 1000 !! with extra RAM.
486 or something.
By that stage work figured I was into it and I took over the SBD ( Special Business Division) Service team and trained on the first laser printers, Word processors and small computers that Xerox launched. I was already the national 'Faxpert' and supporting MemoryWriters, the first typewriters with processing power including disk drives and screens. Then launched the first Digital Printer\Copier\Scanners for the company followed by Electronic Documentation systems from USA and Japan with connected Diag SW to products.
A very practical PC path for me..
You can now understand why DIY is in my blood
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 02-12-2014, 07:13 AM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 7,108
ZX-81 (from UK)..
home built 16k memory (with static RAM chip)
Then, home built Apple][.. with home built Z80 card..
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 02-12-2014, 03:41 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by gary View Post
Hi Rick,

It's a small world!

We also used DN3000's, DN4000's, DN3500's and 425t's.

Still retain some as a collection.

Working with the Apollo's in the 80's and early 90's was arguably
one of the best and most productive computing environments I have
ever enjoyed.

The networking was integral to the operating system and as luck would
have it, network access speeds and disk access speeds in those days
were closely matched on these machines so when you had a network
of them, you had one big hierarchical file system that was pretty fast.

To this day I can't understand why we are stuck with SMB, AFS
and NFS. How could such second-rate networking architectures have won?

Plus the Display Manager and integrated text editor just kicked-ass.
Transcript pads that were effectively infinitely long. Really nicely
thought-out.

In collaborative engineering environments, they were amazingly productive.
We would run DSEE and when you would do a build it would use all the
machines on the network you had nominated to perform the compiles.

At three companies I worked for we used Mentor Graphics CAD
software on them.

At one company here in Sydney, I was assigned their first DN3000
along with about $120,000 of CAD software on it in the mid-1980's.
Though the company had about 400 employees, for a time I was the
only one using a mouse and a 19" colour graphics terminal.

It was such an eye-opening thing at the time that visitors
given the corporate tour would be shown it. It would be explained to them
that "this is called a mouse" and "this is a windowing system".

I recollect at the time going to a tradeshow with a colleague and Apple
had just released their very first Macintosh. We played with it briefly
and having been so spoilt by the Apollo workstations we turned and looked
at each other and involuntarily both burst out in laughter. It was
just a tiny tinker toy.

But fast forward to 2014 and Apple had the last laugh with the largest
market capitalization in the world. But despite that, I still look back at
the Apollo's and they had features sadly lacking in Mac OS X to this day.

Did you ever get to travel to the Apollo factory in Chelmsford?
Gary,

Yes, Apollo had a remarkably good network operating system for the time with features that would still be advanced today. Alas, the best technical solutions don't always win in the market. Still, they would have been toast sooner or later unless they had done a major pivot. Nobody pays tens of thousands of dollars for a graphics workstation any more!

I didn't ever get over to Chelmsford, unfortunately.

Cheers,
Rick.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 02-12-2014, 04:12 PM
graham.hobart's Avatar
graham.hobart (Graham stevens)
DeepSkySlacker

graham.hobart is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: hobart, tasmania
Posts: 2,241
first puter

The commodores, with the tape feed. I remember that annoying tennis game too. Also a tank battle game with very similar graphics to the tennis game!
I was given one of the earlier big old macs a few years ago and wish I had kept it but needed the room. Would have been a talking point.
My brother got one of those hand held space invader games for Christmas one year - very jealous of that (about the same time digital watches came out!!) Mind you he got all the cool pressies and we as younger brothers got the cast offs!!
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 02-12-2014, 04:18 PM
pluto's Avatar
pluto (Hugh)
Astro Noob

pluto is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,982
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS View Post
Nobody pays tens of thousands of dollars for a graphics workstation any more!
They certainly do!

My current workstation for the visual effects work I do was about $9k, I'll be upgrading pretty soon and the new one will come to around $10k - and that's just a linux box!
For my job it would be easy to spend ~$13K if you chose to work on a Mac.

A compositing workstation is much more if you include the cost of the drives and any video and audio processing/output hardware you need. We have a Smoke-on-Mac box here that was about $35K including software and drives etc. and a Flame box would start at around $80k.

I do however remember the SGI days when my O2 workstation cost about $150k and a Flame suite started at about $1 million.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 02-12-2014, 04:54 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by pluto View Post
They certainly do!
That was possibly a slight exaggeration, but 95% of the applications that used to run on high-end workstations now work fine on a cheap laptop.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement