Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 21-08-2014, 09:17 PM
phobos27's Avatar
phobos27 (Nick)
Registered User

phobos27 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony_ View Post
Much better! The galaxy itself looks much better, although your stacked image looks very dark compared to the sub? The histogram is too far to the left which makes the background too dark and the stars too bright. I don't know what is wrong - but I suspect there is still something not quite right happening in DSS.

It's not a particularly easy galaxy to image. The nucleus is fairly bright but the arms are fairly faint - especially the finer detail.

Regards,
Tony.
Thanks Tony! The Sub is always darker like Kevin said. So hopefully that is the problem. I am happy with the result I have gotten so I will just leave it!

Quote:
Originally Posted by cometcatcher View Post
DSS does the same thing to me - the stack is much darker than an individual sub. There is an adjustment for that also, but in the end it doesn't make much difference to the image when stretched so I just leave it.
Thank you both for all your help and for staying with me. It has been an experience to say the least. Might try this again in the future and we will see what we get then!

Regards
Nick
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 21-08-2014, 11:05 PM
Tony_ (Tony)
Registered User

Tony_ is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 465
My first 6744 looked a lot worse than this. My more recent one was better - but no-where near enough exposure time.
Did you use flats for this image? When I started I never used flats - I just processed out the vignetting, but flats make a huge difference. It will give a much more even background and will enable you to bring out more detail.

My images are still quite humble compared to the ones posted here - but I still enjoy it as long as the image resembles the object without too much noise and horrible stars.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 23-08-2014, 05:35 PM
phobos27's Avatar
phobos27 (Nick)
Registered User

phobos27 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony_ View Post
My first 6744 looked a lot worse than this. My more recent one was better - but no-where near enough exposure time.
Did you use flats for this image? When I started I never used flats - I just processed out the vignetting, but flats make a huge difference. It will give a much more even background and will enable you to bring out more detail.

My images are still quite humble compared to the ones posted here - but I still enjoy it as long as the image resembles the object without too much noise and horrible stars.
Thanks Tony. I only took light frames for this photo because I forgot to do anything else. I have actually never tried taking flat or bias frames, only dark because I do not know how to take them. Might try this again next time.

Nick
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement