Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Eyepieces, Barlows and Filters
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 5 votes, 5.00 average.
  #21  
Old 06-03-2014, 10:38 PM
AG Hybrid's Avatar
AG Hybrid (Adrian)
A Friendly Nyctophiliac

AG Hybrid is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toongabbie, NSW
Posts: 1,597
Well I did as you said Don. It was some hard work if I'm honest and quite dirty. Turns out Synta makes that part of the focuser out of aluminum. The pictures show the difference. Got all the in focus in the world now.

1# How it was to start with.
2# After the modification to the adapter.
3# Turns out I could remove the 2" adapter and thanks to the snug fit the HRCC sat in the draw tube nicely.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (HRCC1.jpg)
195.0 KB277 views
Click for full-size image (HRCC2.jpg)
191.3 KB253 views
Click for full-size image (HRCC3.jpg)
190.1 KB248 views
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 13-09-2014, 01:54 AM
Don Pensack's Avatar
Don Pensack
Registered User

Don Pensack is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 534
I got to thinking about this, and though the HRCC can be held in the newly-modified focuser top ring (as in the 3rd photo), the length of the HRCC barrel supported this way will be small. Adding a heavy eyepiece could cause the HRCC and eyepiece to tilt off axis.
If the 2" adapter is used, the HRCC is supported along a much longer section of "tube", and while this doesn't get the maximum in travel, it may support the HRCC and eyepiece better.
After all, the modification made to the focuser ring shows a substantial in-travel was gained between picture 1 and picture 2.
Sorry my comment was 6 months later, but i was thinking about coma correctors and remembered this thread.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 21-09-2014, 05:19 PM
AG Hybrid's Avatar
AG Hybrid (Adrian)
A Friendly Nyctophiliac

AG Hybrid is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toongabbie, NSW
Posts: 1,597
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Pensack View Post
I got to thinking about this, and though the HRCC can be held in the newly-modified focuser top ring (as in the 3rd photo), the length of the HRCC barrel supported this way will be small. Adding a heavy eyepiece could cause the HRCC and eyepiece to tilt off axis.
If the 2" adapter is used, the HRCC is supported along a much longer section of "tube", and while this doesn't get the maximum in travel, it may support the HRCC and eyepiece better.
After all, the modification made to the focuser ring shows a substantial in-travel was gained between picture 1 and picture 2.
Sorry my comment was 6 months later, but i was thinking about coma correctors and remembered this thread.
This of course, is true. When I use it its at Picture 2. I have enough in focus for my 100 and 82 degree eyepiece. Not enough for my Delos and XW10 though. But, they do not even slightly need coma correction at f5 imo. The stars are pinpoint and flat all across the 70 degrees - at least to my eyes.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 27-09-2014, 01:37 AM
bytor666
Cygnus X-1

bytor666 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 366
Another reason why I wouldn't want to own a CC. Way too much fiddling. I just put in the eyepiece, re-center when needed and enjoy the views w/o worrying about coma or edges.....and I used to be a stickler for edges....not anymore!

There's too much out there to see to worry about aberrations, which is my own way of doing things....others such as yourself are different, which is ok.

Glad to see it worked out for you!!!

Cheers!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement