Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 16-07-2006, 01:51 PM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
Ah ha!!!!

You might have nailed it Lester. Good work.

Let Asi and Ken know

Last edited by matt; 16-07-2006 at 02:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 16-07-2006, 02:49 PM
Lester's Avatar
Lester
Registered User

Lester is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
Yep. Uranus has its poles tilted at 98 degrees, with one pole continually facing the sun.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 16-07-2006, 02:59 PM
John K's Avatar
John K
Registered User

John K is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,481
Thanks for all the comments guys, interesting stuff.

I was sure very surprised to see any kind of detail on the disk, so it is possibly artifacts, as I too do not believe that Uranus shows any surface detail.

I did as John suggested and looked at the green channel and there is something there, artifact, belts etc.

Interestingly enough it appears that the poles of Uranus are not pointing at the sun at the moment and we have a nice equatorial plane view. I used the JPL simulator to find that out. See here:

http://space.jpl.nasa.gov/

or for Uranus today:

http://space.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ws...rbs=1&showsc=1
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 16-07-2006, 03:30 PM
slice of heaven
Registered User

slice of heaven is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: S.A.
Posts: 1,079
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt
Not even the Keck... captured the bands, eh?
http://www2.keck.hawaii.edu/news/science/uranus/


Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 16-07-2006, 03:33 PM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
interesting....

I thought you meant the detail it caught was "the rings and moons" only.

Some surface detail there also. I'd imagine you'd need something like the Keck though to see those details. I could be wrong but I guess it's beyond the capabilities of the average backyard scope?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 16-07-2006, 05:27 PM
Lester's Avatar
Lester
Registered User

Lester is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
Well John,

at least you got the colour correct.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 17-07-2006, 09:34 AM
slice of heaven
Registered User

slice of heaven is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: S.A.
Posts: 1,079
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt
I guess it's beyond the capabilities of the average backyard scope?
At the rate the planet imagers on this site are moving, probably not till next week.

I dug through my old computer last night for a couple of links I saved.
The first one I think is a fairly honest shot from 4 years ago with the moons.

http://www.kk-system.co.jp/Alpo/kk02/u020719z.htm

This second one is from a couple of years ago, it created a bit of discussion on another site on the processing of artifacts in/out of the final image
In steps 2 and 3 you can see banding before the noise is removed.
http://www.geocities.com/rolo0235/Pl...ndoChavez.html

Scroll to the bottom of the last link and there's an image of Neptune as well.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 17-07-2006, 11:12 AM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
gee slice, looks like we have a ways to go then
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement