Quote:
Originally Posted by Argonavis
I am not sure what you think you will achieve by doing that. The teachers grasp of astronomy may come from the astrology columns in the newspaper. I don't think we can expect teachers, and especially primary school teachers, to be highly knowledgable in all fields of science and technology. Most people get limited exposure to this stuff. About all of us are specialists in one field or another.
I suspect all you need to do is provide some information in one form or another. Your job is to educate the public, including students and teachers, not belittle them.
|
I would not achieve anything by replying to the letter in Latin. Added to that, I can only speak botanical Latin so the letter would go along the lines of:
What are the stars made of?
Eucalyptus grandis, Banksia collina var. spinulosa and
Sarracenia leucophylla.
That statement was made in jest and to appease my ruffled feathers. I might also add that, taken in full context, I did say that I would give the students some guidance. I am more than happy to gently educate people (as opposed to ramming stuff down their throat) but my feathers were ruffled because I (or whoever answers the letter) am expected to sign a declaration stating the information given is true. The implication being, if the teacher did not attempt to force me to give factual information by way of the signed declaration, then I would reply with falsehoods.
Respect begets respect.
If the teacher suggested to the students that they should write a letter to the astronomers at the planetarium then that is fine (although, as previously stated, they should really do their own research). The way the questions are worded; well that's not a problem either. Part of my job is to re-interpret questions that are badly phrased. I get this on a daily basis and I'm sure we have all come across the most common one - What magnification should I look for when buying a telescope? That is re-interpreted in terms of aperture.
It was that signed declaration that put a completely new spin on the matter. Why would you ask someone questions pertaining to their field of speciality if you did not trust them to give a factual answer? It is this level of innate mistrust that I find objectionable and hence my annoyance by it.
Here the matter rests until we contact the teacher concerned and gently probe as to why the letter was couched in the terms it was. I'll keep you informed.
Peter.