Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 07-11-2013, 09:23 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,657
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobF View Post
Whoosh - right through the hoop. What a shot
Hey, a magenta/blue lover huh?

Cheers Rob, glad ya liked it...10hrs was long enough for me ..I will do better at some stage though

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-11-2013, 09:27 PM
Shiraz's Avatar
Shiraz (Ray)
Registered User

Shiraz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ardrossan south australia
Posts: 4,918
Really outdid yourself this time Mike - what a cracker of an image, Nice that you are regularly seeing stuff that no-one else seems to.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-11-2013, 10:21 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,657
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiraz View Post
Really outdid yourself this time Mike - what a cracker of an image, Nice that you are regularly seeing stuff that no-one else seems to.
I'm deluded...but I do believe the statement in my signature

Cheers for the nice comment Ray

MIke
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-11-2013, 11:39 PM
nandopg's Avatar
nandopg
Registered User

nandopg is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Santa Rita do Sapucai - Brazil
Posts: 303
Hi Mike,
Thank you for sharing such a stupendous image that in the end sets a new standard of reference for all of us, well at least for me.

Best Regards,

Fernando
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-11-2013, 12:20 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,657
Quote:
Originally Posted by nandopg View Post
Hi Mike,
Thank you for sharing such a stupendous image that in the end sets a new standard of reference for all of us, well at least for me.

Best Regards,

Fernando
Hey thanks Fernando, very glad you liked it

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-11-2013, 07:55 AM
cybereye's Avatar
cybereye (Mario)
Mozzies love me!

cybereye is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,287
Mike,

What can I say - I love your work!

Another fantastic image from "La Casa di Sidonio"...

Cheers,
Mario
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 08-11-2013, 12:50 PM
SpaceNoob (Chris)
Atlas Observatory

SpaceNoob is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Canberra
Posts: 268
Great image Mike, nice faint structures are clearly visible.

Sure it could do with another 10hrs, but thats enough time for a new target!
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-11-2013, 04:39 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,657
Quote:
Originally Posted by cybereye View Post
Mike,

What can I say - I love your work!

Another fantastic image from "La Casa di Sidonio"...

Cheers,
Mario
Thanks Mother Mario

Quote:
Great image Mike, nice faint structures are clearly visible.
Cheers Chris, glad you could make'em out

Quote:
Sure it could do with another 10hrs, but thats enough time for a new target!
Shhhhh don't say that mate

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-11-2013, 03:13 AM
broca's Avatar
broca (Steve Coates)
Registered User

broca is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ocala, Florida USA
Posts: 88
Beautiful image Mike. It is crazy what you are able to pull out of these galaxies from your skies!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-11-2013, 08:14 AM
marc4darkskies's Avatar
marc4darkskies (Marcus)
Billions and Billions ...

marc4darkskies is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Quialigo, NSW
Posts: 3,143
I guess I've been a little preoccupied! Missed this one

That's a ripper image Mike ... and I CAN see the faint arm!

Cheers, Marcus
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 10-11-2013, 11:52 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,657
Quote:
Originally Posted by broca View Post
Beautiful image Mike. It is crazy what you are able to pull out of these galaxies from your skies!
Cheers Steve and yes darker skies certainly make a lot of difference

Quote:
Originally Posted by marc4darkskies View Post
I guess I've been a little preoccupied! Missed this one

That's a ripper image Mike ... and I CAN see the faint arm!

Cheers, Marcus
He he, there are a lot of old myopic eyes out there

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-11-2013, 07:52 PM
David Fitz-Henr's Avatar
David Fitz-Henr
Registered User

David Fitz-Henr is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bowen Mountain
Posts: 837
That's a lovely image Mike; some faint arms there with that large outer faint arm at the top looking quite impressive!
A general question / thought regarding the presence of magenta in galaxy images - given that spiral arms contain copious amounts of hydrogen as well as hot blue stars I wonder whether there should be a little magenta in these images? If the data supports it and the stars look balanced, perhaps the colour selection tool in PS should not be used that aggressively as in many images I've seen?

Anyway, looks good to me Mike
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-11-2013, 09:13 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,657
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Fitz-Henr View Post
That's a lovely image Mike; some faint arms there with that large outer faint arm at the top looking quite impressive!
A general question / thought regarding the presence of magenta in galaxy images - given that spiral arms contain copious amounts of hydrogen as well as hot blue stars I wonder whether there should be a little magenta in these images? If the data supports it and the stars look balanced, perhaps the colour selection tool in PS should not be used that aggressively as in many images I've seen?

Anyway, looks good to me Mike
Cheers Dave

Hey you may well be right about the magenta aaaand I have been criticized for it but in the end it is a pretty minor issue really and is more obvious to some than others. Each galaxy image seems to come together a little differently from a colour perspective, besides there is sooo much more about an image of a distant island of billions of stars with complex faint structures and jets ()...than any minor colour bias fixation
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 12-11-2013, 11:00 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,657
Here's a comparison with a deep image by the UK Schmidt

Deep Image NGC 1512

It is clear modern sensors can make small telescopes more sensitive than using chemical emulsion on very large telescopes

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 13-11-2013, 09:24 PM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,735
Impressive for sure
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 13-11-2013, 11:46 PM
madbadgalaxyman's Avatar
madbadgalaxyman (Robert)
Registered User

madbadgalaxyman is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 936
Very interesting, Mike.

The outer extremely-faint arms have a very unusual pattern.

The galex Far-ultraviolet band is very sensitive to the light from even relatively small numbers of hot young OB stars ( = recent star formation), so you are doing very well to pick up the blue knotty outer arms of this galaxy.

The arm pattern near the satellite galaxy is indeed distinctly weird.

This H-alpha image from the SINGG survey (with H-alpha image displayed as Orange) (H-alpha line only is coded as orange, because stellar light was subtracted from the H-alpha image) shows some of the outer arm material. The fact that the arms are luminous in Ha is proof that the knotty material consists of hot young OB stars.
Another interesting feature is that the little satellite galaxy looks bright in H-alpha, so it is likely to be very vigorously forming stars.

Click image for larger version

Name:	N1512.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	195.2 KB
ID:	151640
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 14-11-2013, 05:07 AM
glenc's Avatar
glenc (Glen)
star-hopper

glenc is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Terranora
Posts: 4,372
That is an amazing image Mike.
Here are the first descriptions of NGC 1512.
https://picasaweb.google.com/1100488...28767992263970
They were made by James Dunlop in 1826 and John Herschel.
Dunlop 466 "A small faint round nebula; about 25" diameter, a little brighter in the centre: a star of the 10th or 12th magnitude preceding the nebula."
Dunlop discovered about 50 galaxies.
https://picasaweb.google.com/1100488...2146/Dunlop28#
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 14-11-2013, 08:22 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,657
Quote:
Originally Posted by madbadgalaxyman View Post
Very interesting, Mike.

The outer extremely-faint arms have a very unusual pattern.

The galex Far-ultraviolet band is very sensitive to the light from even relatively small numbers of hot young OB stars ( = recent star formation), so you are doing very well to pick up the blue knotty outer arms of this galaxy.

The arm pattern near the satellite galaxy is indeed distinctly weird.

This H-alpha image from the SINGG survey (with H-alpha image displayed as Orange) (H-alpha line only is coded as orange, because stellar light was subtracted from the H-alpha image) shows some of the outer arm material. The fact that the arms are luminous in Ha is proof that the knotty material consists of hot young OB stars.
Another interesting feature is that the little satellite galaxy looks bright in H-alpha, so it is likely to be very vigorously forming stars.

Attachment 151640
Quote:
Originally Posted by glenc View Post
That is an amazing image Mike.
Here are the first descriptions of NGC 1512.
https://picasaweb.google.com/1100488...28767992263970
They were made by James Dunlop in 1826 and John Herschel.
Dunlop 466 "A small faint round nebula; about 25" diameter, a little brighter in the centre: a star of the 10th or 12th magnitude preceding the nebula."
Dunlop discovered about 50 galaxies.
https://picasaweb.google.com/1100488...2146/Dunlop28#
Thanks for checking it out guys Seems that long outer arm is full mostly of new stars then..?

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 15-11-2013, 12:28 AM
madbadgalaxyman's Avatar
madbadgalaxyman (Robert)
Registered User

madbadgalaxyman is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 936
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Thanks for checking it out guys Seems that long outer arm is full mostly of new stars then..?

Mike
Hi Mike,
Yes, indeed....something is making those new stars in the outer regions of this galaxy, so it must therefore follow that there is lots of gas and lots of energy out there, even though there is not much visible in the outermost regions apart from the very faint and unusual arms.

I am certain (at about the 99 percent certainty level) that the outermost arm is experiencing current star formation;
there are usually O and B stars formed in a recent vigorous Star-Formation episode, and these hot young over-luminous stars:
(1) are very prominent in the far-ultraviolet, so they light up like flares in the GALEX satellite images
(2) will light up the gas in the surrounding gas clouds from which they formed, by ionizing the gas and making it glow in Ha, as it requires short wavelength ultraviolet photons from massive luminous new stars to produce an HII region.

One interesting question is, "why should stars form so vigorously, so far from the main optically-bright body of NGC 1512?"
Something has to give interstellar gas a really hard "hit or shock" in order to get it to contract and to form new stars.
So a strong shock wave is required in the outer regions of this galaxy, and also a supply of interstellar gas is needed in order to make the new stars.

It has got me speculating as to whether an encounter with the little companion galaxy might be responsible for the unusual pattern of the outer arms; but the mass difference between the primary and secondary galaxy must be significant. You really need a lot of gas and a lot of energy to make the very-luminous "new & blue" stars that are evident in the outermost arm.

Here is the Galex far-ultraviolet plus near-ultraviolet image, using the GalexView interface. FUV displays as blue, and it is almost certain that the bright knotty FUV emission of the outer arms is coming from newly-formed "hot & young" very-luminous stars.

Click image for larger version

Name:	N1512_galex.jpg
Views:	18
Size:	188.2 KB
ID:	151733
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 15-11-2013, 09:45 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,657
Well it looks to me Robbo like something was doing burnouts and doughnuts around this galaxy and has whipped the arms into threads...perhaps the little companion galaxy is the culprit?

Mike
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement