Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.
  #21  
Old 21-10-2013, 09:40 AM
ausastronomer (John Bambury)
Registered User

ausastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven Heads, NSW
Posts: 2,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason D View Post
do NOT worry about how the secondary mirror is mounted.

Jason
Hi Jason,

While that is fine in theory; and in fact in practice, in terms of telescope performance, there are other things to consider. The main one being that most people that spend somewhere between $10,000 and $100,000 on a custom built truss dob don't understand the optical theory behind collimation and they don't look at collimation ray trace diagrams. They just expect everything to be squared, properly symmetrical and properly aligned and positioned. The fact that it doesn't matter in practice in terms of telescope performance, is totally academic to them. In this regard a well collimated laser does a good job of squaring the focuser and positioning the secondary when the Upper Cage Assembly is initially being set up for the first time.

Cheers,
John B
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 21-10-2013, 11:48 AM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,927
We seem to have drifted away from the needs of the original post and into the realms of multi thousand dollar telescopes.....
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 21-10-2013, 11:55 AM
Jason D's Avatar
Jason D (Jason)
Registered User

Jason D is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: California USA
Posts: 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by ausastronomer View Post
Hi Jason,

While that is fine in theory; and in fact in practice, in terms of telescope performance, there are other things to consider. The main one being that most people that spend somewhere between $10,000 and $100,000 on a custom built truss dob don't understand the optical theory behind collimation and they don't look at collimation ray trace diagrams. They just expect everything to be squared, properly symmetrical and properly aligned and positioned. The fact that it doesn't matter in practice in terms of telescope performance, is totally academic to them. In this regard a well collimated laser does a good job of squaring the focuser and positioning the secondary when the Upper Cage Assembly is initially being set up for the first time.

Cheers,
John B
John, it is the other way around. In my last post, I was advocating for a simple and a practical collimation method.
A laser does do a good job is squaring the focuser but it does not do a good job in positioning the secondary mirror under the focuser -- unless it has a holographic attachment.
Jason
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 21-10-2013, 01:13 PM
ausastronomer (John Bambury)
Registered User

ausastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven Heads, NSW
Posts: 2,620
Hi Jason,

You don't use the laser and center spotted secondary for anything other than the vertical positioning of the secondary holder in the UCA; and it does an excellent job of this task. You don't use the laser or center spot for any of the other secondary adjustments like tilt, or axial rotation.

Cheers,
John B
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement