Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 29-05-2006, 07:08 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by Striker
Great work guys....

Houghy just 1 thing with IP you must select Edit and copy a portion of image and crop some all around the image...you can see where the images have been stacked and you get that difference in frames...this will affect your histogram and should be done before you apply the digital development....just a tip mate....get rid of it before processing....but otherwise a great job on the images guys.
caught out!!!! yes i spent exactly 12 minutes processing those images, thanks for the tip though
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 29-05-2006, 07:35 PM
tornado33
Registered User

tornado33 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,116
Howdy.
1ponders, I use IRIS to do the dark subtraction, I generally try to take at least 2 darks just after my imaging run (so is at similar temperature) as the camera isnt temp controlled theres always a slight variation, so the darks never 100% match the light frames, Iris fixes that by a dark optomization proceedure where it askes me to draw a small box on one of the light images in a part free of stars or nebulae, but encompassing some hot pixels, it then matches the dark for a close to perfect subtraction. In theory, a 5 minute dark could be used with 10 minute light images and so on, though for best results I try to keep same dark times as light exposure times. Ive actually used darks taken on different nights to reasonable effect. I believe the next update of Images Plus will have this feature also.
Info on the dark optomization here
http://www.astrosurf.com/buil/iris/t...3/doc13_us.htm
scroll down to Preprocessing where it will say
"Note: you can optimize the dark map during the preprocessing phase, or in a separate step (for this run Dark optimization command of Digital Photo menu). Here, for simplify, we consider similar conditions between the science images and the dark images."
Scott
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 29-05-2006, 10:50 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,691
Excellent!

I enjoyed looking at this iamge Scott it's an all-round great image

You are getting a lot out of that 350D, just imagine what you could get out of a real CCD...?

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 29-05-2006, 10:53 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Scott,

I think this has to be your best to date.

Phenomenal.

Well done.

Regards,
Humayun
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 30-05-2006, 10:33 AM
seeker372011's Avatar
seeker372011 (Narayan)
6EQUJ5

seeker372011 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,663
great image-the d etail you have captured is quite out of the ordinary.

BTW most people seem to recommend an odd number of dark frames when processing in IRIS..not that is seems to have mattered given yur fine result
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 30-05-2006, 03:58 PM
tornado33
Registered User

tornado33 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,116
Thanks.
Gee thats interesting re the odd no. of darks, however I might try that next time and shoot 3 darks.
Scott
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 30-05-2006, 04:06 PM
tornado33
Registered User

tornado33 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,116
Just thinking, I must try Berts lens on the helix, @f2.8 I may be able to go even deeper
Scott
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 30-05-2006, 04:12 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by tornado33
Just thinking, I must try Berts lens on the helix, @f2.8 I may be able to go even deeper
Scott
not tonight you wont! BTw, would you then up the iso rating to say 800 or go 200 as well as the 400?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 30-05-2006, 08:52 PM
tornado33
Registered User

tornado33 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,116
Yes weather is shocking now.
Id shoot at ISO 200, 5 or 10 mins max each exposure, a higher ISO would see too much skyfog as F2.8 aperature lets in a huge amount of light.
Scott
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 30-05-2006, 09:00 PM
PhotonCollector's Avatar
PhotonCollector (Paul)
All alone in the night

PhotonCollector is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW. Australia.
Posts: 607
well done Scott, that's a fine image and you got the outer loop!

Paul M
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 30-05-2006, 09:07 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhotonCollector
well done Scott, that's a fine image and you got the outer loop!

Paul M
And we know the extents that Scott will go to to prove he is loopy , don't we Paul
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement