Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average.
  #181  
Old 18-04-2016, 09:34 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by astroron View Post
Still waiting.
Cheers
Got an Answer for you Ron!

It's called Scl-MM-Dw1 and is at

R.A. (h:m:s) 00:47:34.93 ± 2''
Decl. (d:m:s) −26:23:19.7 ± 2''

Paper is HERE

They used the 6.5m Magellan telescope, so......I win!

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #182  
Old 18-04-2016, 10:47 PM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Got an Answer for you Ron!

It's called Scl-MM-Dw1 and is at

R.A. (h:m:s) 00:47:34.93 ± 2''
Decl. (d:m:s) −26:23:19.7 ± 2''

Paper is HERE

They used the 6.5m Magellan telescope, so......I win!

Mike
Great stuff Mike
And thanks
I won't bother looking with the 16" then
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #183  
Old 18-04-2016, 11:03 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by astroron View Post
Great stuff Mike
And thanks
I won't bother looking with the 16" then
Cheers
Yeah Gary Kopff noted it in his reply (#31) to my original post but I didn't recognise it as the No.1 of my No.2 at that stage but our paper's author Aaron Romanowsky has confirmed it is indeed our dw1

With a surface brightness similar to my little baby of 26mag/squ arc sec, you'd essentially....have Buckley's mate

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #184  
Old 18-04-2016, 11:32 PM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Yeah Gary Kopff noted it in his reply (#31) to my original post but I didn't recognise it as the No.1 of my No.2 at that stage but our paper's author Aaron Romanowsky has confirmed it is indeed our dw1

With a surface brightness similar to my little baby of 26mag/squ arc sec, you'd essentially....have Buckley's mate

Mike
Yes I missed Gary's post as well,thanks for the reminder.
Now go and take a picture of #1 to complement your #2.
Cheers
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement