Great stuff Mike
And thanks
I won't bother looking with the 16" then
Cheers
Yeah Gary Kopff noted it in his reply (#31) to my original post but I didn't recognise it as the No.1 of my No.2 at that stage but our paper's author Aaron Romanowsky has confirmed it is indeed our dw1
With a surface brightness similar to my little baby of 26mag/squ arc sec, you'd essentially....have Buckley's mate
Yeah Gary Kopff noted it in his reply (#31) to my original post but I didn't recognise it as the No.1 of my No.2 at that stage but our paper's author Aaron Romanowsky has confirmed it is indeed our dw1
With a surface brightness similar to my little baby of 26mag/squ arc sec, you'd essentially....have Buckley's mate
Mike
Yes I missed Gary's post as well,thanks for the reminder.
Now go and take a picture of #1 to complement your #2.
Cheers