Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Talk
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 29-05-2014, 03:05 PM
OzStarGazer's Avatar
OzStarGazer
Nerd from Outer Space

OzStarGazer is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Next to my scope
Posts: 1,091
Is it possible...

... to take a photo of the new moon?? I mean really 100% new. I managed to take a couple of nice photos two days before it was new, a little bit less nice 1 day before it was new, but when it is really new it is so close to the sun I wonder if an amateur astrophotographer can take pics at all. It seems to be impossible. Without a solar filter it is dangerous, and with a filter the moon won't be visible anyway? Thanks for your thoughts.
PS: I tried to search the forum, but didn't find anything...

Last edited by OzStarGazer; 29-05-2014 at 03:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 29-05-2014, 04:34 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
When it's 100% new it's called a total solar eclipse.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 29-05-2014, 04:39 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
This is about as "new" as I can get it.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (moon0402b.jpg)
76.4 KB30 views
Click for full-size image (moon0501B.jpg)
137.1 KB32 views
Click for full-size image (moon0501a.jpg)
139.2 KB48 views
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 29-05-2014, 05:05 PM
OzStarGazer's Avatar
OzStarGazer
Nerd from Outer Space

OzStarGazer is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Next to my scope
Posts: 1,091
Nice.
The first two are similar to mine except that the dark part is darker (in mine). How did you do the last one, I mean with details in the bright part? Which settings did you use? When I can see details in the bright part, the dark part is usually almost totally dark...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 29-05-2014, 06:51 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
The last one is 2 seconds at ISO 100. But the only reason you can see both areas bright and dark, is the cloud that moved over the lit part of the Moon. Normally cameras don't have the dynamic range to see both.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 29-05-2014, 07:01 PM
OzStarGazer's Avatar
OzStarGazer
Nerd from Outer Space

OzStarGazer is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Next to my scope
Posts: 1,091
Quote:
Originally Posted by cometcatcher View Post
The last one is 2 seconds at ISO 100. But the only reason you can see both areas bright and dark, is the cloud that moved over the lit part of the Moon. Normally cameras don't have the dynamic range to see both.
Oh, a lucky shot!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 29-05-2014, 11:36 PM
Blue Skies's Avatar
Blue Skies (Jacquie)
It's about time

Blue Skies is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,221
Quote:
Originally Posted by OzStarGazer View Post
PS: I tried to search the forum, but didn't find anything...
Ah, well, you need to use the right term

If you put "Danjon Limit" into a search engine you will find the answer you are looking for.

The short answer is "No, you can't do 100%" but the answer about the total solar eclipse is also right!

Second, the Danjon limit describes the closest the Moon can be to the Sun and still be detected, which the French astronomer Danjon worked out to be 7 degrees separation. There were a series of articles in Sky & Telescope about this during the 2000's where some Middle East amateurs tried to break this with some big binoculars and I think they may have managed to crack it. There is a bit of debate about the limit as well, so you should be able to find plenty of reading about it now you know what to search for.

There was a mention of it in this thread.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 30-05-2014, 08:58 AM
OzStarGazer's Avatar
OzStarGazer
Nerd from Outer Space

OzStarGazer is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Next to my scope
Posts: 1,091
Thank you, Jackie!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 30-05-2014, 03:21 PM
rustigsmed's Avatar
rustigsmed (Russell)
Registered User

rustigsmed is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Australia
Posts: 3,959
i recall a news article maybe a year or two ago, a french (i think) astrophotographer just after new moon and set some kind of record - the telescope had all sorts of baffling set up to block the sun. if i find it i'll post it for you.

cheers
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 30-05-2014, 03:23 PM
rustigsmed's Avatar
rustigsmed (Russell)
Registered User

rustigsmed is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Australia
Posts: 3,959
http://legault.perso.sfr.fr/new_moon_2013july8.html

didn't take long thankfully!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 30-05-2014, 08:44 PM
Blue Skies's Avatar
Blue Skies (Jacquie)
It's about time

Blue Skies is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,221
4.6 degrees - Smashed it!

Reminds me of a situation a few years ago of Venus being visible during solar conjunction in a similar situation.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 31-05-2014, 07:13 AM
OzStarGazer's Avatar
OzStarGazer
Nerd from Outer Space

OzStarGazer is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Next to my scope
Posts: 1,091
Amazing! The guy should get into the Guinness Book of Records!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement