Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Talk
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 30-10-2013, 04:24 PM
Babylon5 (Shane)
Registered User

Babylon5 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 13
Is it possible to piggyback a 8" Celestron OTA to a 16" Meade LX200

I know it sounds like a bit of a strange question. But my neighbour has an observatory and a Meade LX200 16" telescope. We would like to piggyback a Celestron 8" OTA to the 16". As we will have a hyperstar fitted to the Celestron and using a QHY8 to take photos.

Ultimately I'd love to somehow adapt the hyperstar to fit the Meade 16" but I'm pretty sure that is near impossible. So the next best thing we thought of was to put the Celestron 8" on the 16" Meade and we can make full use of the observatory and the fixed alignment. It's only a small observatory so not enough room to put in another mount.

Am I asking too much? Is it possible? Or are there alternatives that will do the job better or just as good?

Thanks,
Shane.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-11-2013, 02:15 PM
Poita (Peter)
Registered User

Poita is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NSW Country
Posts: 3,586
I had a C6 piggybacked on a Meade 10", you are just scaling up a bit

I think you could do it with a bar on the 16", depending on the capacity of the mount.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-11-2013, 02:49 PM
Babylon5 (Shane)
Registered User

Babylon5 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poita View Post
I had a C6 piggybacked on a Meade 10", you are just scaling up a bit

I think you could do it with a bar on the 16", depending on the capacity of the mount.
Thanks Poita, You wouldn't have a picture or link to the 'bar'? I'm not that knowledgeable on all the different equipment.

Regards,
Shane.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-11-2013, 01:30 PM
Poita (Peter)
Registered User

Poita is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NSW Country
Posts: 3,586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Babylon5 View Post
Thanks Poita, You wouldn't have a picture or link to the 'bar'? I'm not that knowledgeable on all the different equipment.

Regards,
Shane.
I don't I am afraid, but it was a standard vixen rail.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-11-2013, 01:41 PM
Babylon5 (Shane)
Registered User

Babylon5 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 13
Thanks anyway. I have pretty much given up on trying to do it. Am going to use a F/3.3 focal reducer on the Meade 16" and attach a ccd camera to that. Won't bring the exposure times down as much as a Hyperstar at F/2.1 but probably less hassle in the long run.

Regards,
Shane.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-11-2013, 03:38 PM
mithrandir's Avatar
mithrandir (Andrew)
Registered User

mithrandir is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Glenhaven
Posts: 4,161
If you decide to try piggyback I'd suggest a Vixen rail is a bit light for a C8 with it that far from the mount. D-series rules - either Losmandy or ADM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 23-12-2013, 01:13 PM
baileys2611's Avatar
baileys2611 (Simon Bailey)
I like biscuits

baileys2611 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Murrumbateman
Posts: 337
I found when piggybacking just an 80mm WO APO on my SCT, flexure was a big problem. Now when I image I use off-axis guiding and remove as much weight as possible off the OTA - I'm getting tracking rates of no greater than 1/2 pixel error on good nights, which I'm ok with as an amateur.

Just my experience though, it might work with a suitable cradle that's strong enough to stop the flexure? 16" cradle though? $$$
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement