Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 02-05-2005, 08:58 PM
ErwinvdVelden's Avatar
ErwinvdVelden
Registered User

ErwinvdVelden is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 86
The Bat nebula with Bokkies

Hi everyone,

Since it was cloudy this morning I processed my third image of last observing weekend, IC2948 the Bat nebula. This time I used 6x640s @ 800 ISO with the Celestron 80ED @ f/6.3 and of course the modified D70, although this gets close to CCD, especially since the jpg adds a lot of noise compared to the tif version, especially in the brighter parts! Ambient temperature was 13 degrees, and the dark frames used for dark frame synthesizing work much better now. See

http://www.pbase.com/terrylovejoy/image/42842820

or for the original size:

http://www.pbase.com/terrylovejoy/im...42820/original

Thanks Terry again for providing the web space!

Cheers,
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-05-2005, 09:16 PM
gaa_ian's Avatar
gaa_ian (Ian)
1300 THESKY

gaa_ian is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cairns Qld
Posts: 2,405
Fantastic Shot .... Will have to track that one down to see what it looks like visually
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-05-2005, 09:18 PM
seeker372011's Avatar
seeker372011 (Narayan)
6EQUJ5

seeker372011 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,663
what a super image!

I have been hunting the running chicken nebula for weeks, and was just processing images captured last thursday when I saw this post..now I won't bother!

thanks for sharing


PS
btw would you mind posting a single raw frame? I was just curious to see how much of the red nebulosity there was in teh original data compared to an image through my unmodified 300D

tia

Last edited by seeker372011; 02-05-2005 at 09:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-05-2005, 10:43 PM
ErwinvdVelden's Avatar
ErwinvdVelden
Registered User

ErwinvdVelden is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 86
Dear Tia,

Keep on processing! That's the only way to learn how to make good images!

Thanks for your compliment anyway.

Here is an unprocessed to colour converted RAW frame at 25%, of course heavily JPG compressed.

Cheers,
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (tussen.jpg)
57.0 KB126 views

Last edited by ErwinvdVelden; 02-05-2005 at 10:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-05-2005, 06:00 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Wow it's not even visible in the raw frame! Great image Erwin.. I don't know how you get time for all this astrophotography.. up every morning for the planets and all night for the DSO's
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-05-2005, 06:32 AM
Astroman's Avatar
Astroman (Andrew Wall)
<><><><>

Astroman is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paralowie, South Australia
Posts: 4,367
Should change his nick to Zombie

Great Pics amazing detail What was the telescope ?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-05-2005, 06:37 AM
gaa_ian's Avatar
gaa_ian (Ian)
1300 THESKY

gaa_ian is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cairns Qld
Posts: 2,405
Is it actually possible to see this Nebula
It is listed as an open cluster in the IC Catalog
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-05-2005, 07:11 AM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
Another fantastic image Erwin, keep them coming, I am continually impressed.
Gary
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-05-2005, 12:48 PM
toetoe's Avatar
toetoe (Peter)
Always Trying

toetoe is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Albury, N.S.W.
Posts: 1,296
Unbelievable shots, now you see it, now you don`t.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-05-2005, 12:17 PM
ErwinvdVelden's Avatar
ErwinvdVelden
Registered User

ErwinvdVelden is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 86
Thanks for all the comments, folks!

Actually I'm a Cylon, never need any sleep and am programmed to think I'm an astrophotographer. And I have a plan....

This weekend is observing weekend again, but first Mercury tomorrow morning.

The Bat/Running chicken was shot with the Celestron 80 ED, and with the C9.25 it is visible as a faint glow around an open star cluster.

Cheers,

Last edited by ErwinvdVelden; 05-05-2005 at 12:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-05-2005, 12:27 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
brilliant pic. funny i dont see a running chicken init tho....
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-05-2005, 08:31 AM
tornado33
Registered User

tornado33 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,116
Great pic there. Cound I ask:
Do you autoguide your images, and if how how do you do it, with a webcam and "Guide dog" software or some other method. Do you have a guidescope or off axis guider? Could I also ask what software you use to stack and process the images.
Thanks.
Scott
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-05-2005, 04:50 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
thats magic... thinking of the big bang ...its hard to imagine all those stars (and all the rest) came from a single speck as they say
congratulations on the shot great work
alex
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-05-2005, 06:02 PM
ErwinvdVelden's Avatar
ErwinvdVelden
Registered User

ErwinvdVelden is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 86
Hi Scott,

For the C9.25 I'm using the Celestron radial guider behind the focal
reducer with the Quickcam Pro camera in the guiding eyepiece holder.
The program is Astrovideo with the settings minimum 20 ms interval,
40 ms standard interval and 200 ms maximum interval with the
handcontroller at 1.5x sidereal speed. Exposure time is 2s. The
interface between the computer and the mount is a relay box made by
Albert van Duin.

This whole combination works perfectly with the 80 ED refractor, with
the C9.25 there is still a 1 arcsec wobble in the RA because for some
reason Astrovideo has about 5s delay in processing the guiding
images.

Sofar I was able to find a guide star for every object, it is easier
however to find guide star when using the 80ED than with the C9.25,
because the 80ED has a larger focal plane with less vignetting.

Cheers,
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-05-2005, 06:18 PM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
Great stuff Erwin.....

It's funny now that you dont hear anyone saying that you cant get a image as good as a visual through the eyepiece....

Awesome mate.....
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 29-09-2005, 10:45 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Awsome.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 30-09-2005, 06:34 AM
Itchy's Avatar
Itchy
still trying

Itchy is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hunter Valley
Posts: 513
Hi Erwin

Brilliant once again

Cheers
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement