Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 24-06-2012, 02:44 PM
Gem's Avatar
Gem (Grant)
The serenity...

Gem is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 926
Image of NGC 5247 - an underrated spiral

Hi all,

Here is last night's attempt at NGC 5247. I am really surprised that there are barely any images of this galaxy around. If an imaging noob like me can have a crack, surely some bigger fish will give it more thought...

Scope: 9.25" SCT at f 6.3
Camera: Atik 320E
Guiding: 80mm refractor with QHY5 using PHD
Processing: AstroArt

67 x 3 min (suburban) images plus darks and bias... need to use white frames next time since there is some dust problems.

Any helpful hints welcome. I focused using a bah. mask, but it seems my corrector needs a clean on the inside...
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (120623_NGC5247.jpg)
169.3 KB174 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-06-2012, 06:07 PM
whzzz28's Avatar
whzzz28 (Nathan)
Registered User

whzzz28 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 348
Nice image!
Stars are round as round can be. Image is a little noisy. You had cooling on your CCD? As you mentioned, flats would help the image a lot.

Your stars also seem to lack some color, or rather it looks like they may be overblown sighlty causing what color is there to hit the upper limits (go white).
Did you have to process this image particularly heavily?

With stars as round as that, you'd probably be fine to do 5min subs. Would bring out some more detail and require less processing.
Never the less, better than what i managed to achieve on my last outing!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25-06-2012, 07:13 AM
Gem's Avatar
Gem (Grant)
The serenity...

Gem is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 926
Thanks for the input. My wife does the processing, and I did think it was a little heavy. I will pass on the the feedback. Since I am in town, I usually use 3 min subs. But I will give 5 a try.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-07-2012, 07:11 PM
mojo's Avatar
mojo (Terry)
iceinspace

mojo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,665
Grant, you may be selling yourself short by referring to yourself as a "noob"!

I think it's fantastic. Well done.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-07-2012, 10:55 PM
blink138's Avatar
blink138 (Pat)
Registered User

blink138 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: perth w.a.
Posts: 2,276
hello grant thats a nice target and image
mate do you image just through the visual back and add the reducer to that, or do you have an aftermarket focuser that does not move the primary?
i am asking because when i put my reducer inside my moonlite and take images all four corners are darker than the middle
pat
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-07-2012, 07:23 AM
Gem's Avatar
Gem (Grant)
The serenity...

Gem is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 926
Add the focal reducer to the back in place of the visual back. No after market focuser. I use a bah - mask to focus.
As to the previous comment re: round stars, I should add that my wife does round them off in the processing. They would have a slight elongation otherwise.
It is a rather faint object, so it did get processed a bit too much I think - hence the noise.

Thanks for all the comments!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement