#1  
Old 19-04-2010, 09:34 PM
Bolts_Tweed (Mark)
Registered User

Bolts_Tweed is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Banora Point NSW
Posts: 480
M83 and Eta

Gday

Another fine weekend in SE Qld - unbelievable - blew a force 10 gale at Leyburn but got some data.

Messier 83 is an reporo with shorter exposure mask from my previous post. Eta is just a quickie between gusts.

AstroPhysics EDT130, SBIG ST8300, Atrodon E Series LRGB

M83 LRGB - 160, 80, 80, 80
Eta LRGB - 20, 10, 10, 10

I cant work out the stars but - The stars behind (ok in front of) the M83 image (and the core !!!!) are built on 1 minute exosures and they still look like overexposed blobs - damn this is frustrating - they just lack the zing or pop i'm looking for - more pratice and experimenting I suppose. 30 seconds reduces them a bit but not to something approaching what i'm looking for. Tried short exposures, minimum filter, pinching and that about limits by bag of tricks.

Anyway heres my weekend.

Mark
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (M83.jpg)
25.2 KB42 views
Click for full-size image (ETA.jpg)
32.8 KB31 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 19-04-2010, 09:51 PM
duncan's Avatar
duncan
Duncan

duncan is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Weipa FNQld
Posts: 1,091
Hi Mark,
Re M83, i've seen some members talk about masking stars and i guess reinserting them at much shorter exposure.I think that's what they were on about.
As for Eta i love it , beautiful image.
Well done on both counts.
Cheers,
Duncan
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-04-2010, 10:02 PM
Bolts_Tweed (Mark)
Registered User

Bolts_Tweed is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Banora Point NSW
Posts: 480
Gday Duncan - Thx mate

Yeah the stars in this image (M83) are 1min subs (10 of) LRGB and the galaxy (8 min subs) is masked through the shorter image (I know someone is going to point out the colour gradient so i'll just own up now - )

Damn - I just looked at it and realised it isnt the MLDB image - i'll update it later.

What dumbfounds me is that the gear can resolve small dust lanes in objects like these a few pixels wide but short exposures still give blobs for stars - maybe I am being too picky but it seems that I need to improve star size (or zip or pop) and star colour before I worry about faint fuzzies. Although there is very little processing in these 1 min star images.

I cant believe I am doing this for fun. Makes a root canal easy.

Thx for the comments mate

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-04-2010, 10:09 PM
duncan's Avatar
duncan
Duncan

duncan is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Weipa FNQld
Posts: 1,091
Mark maybe you can reduce the gain,gamma and brightness on the short exposure shots to get them more pin point?
I don't know the answer as i haven't been there. Just a thought.
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-04-2010, 11:21 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Try to lower the black point in your raws and up the white point even if the image looks washed out. Save as a scaled TIFF. Then narrow down the levels and curves in PS while keeping an eye on your histograms and stars.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement