Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 20-09-2007, 11:05 AM
67champ's Avatar
67champ
Registered User

67champ is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 221
Lunar X on the Moon - September 2007 Edition

Lunar X - North American

September 19, 2007 0138 UT picture taken afocally with Fuji S5000 camera attached via universal camera mount to Orion 127mm Mak-Cass with Celestron 42mm Ultima EP; and Lunar X up a little closer, 9:06PM EDT (Sept. 19, 2007 0106UT).

Dana T
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (LunarC X - September 18, 2007 to 938pm EDT 42 Ultima 80A 008.jpg)
69.4 KB61 views
Click for full-size image (Lunar XC - September 18, 2007 to 906pm EDT 42 Ultima 011.jpg)
41.0 KB81 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 21-09-2007, 07:36 AM
jjjnettie's Avatar
jjjnettie (Jeanette)
Registered User

jjjnettie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
Gee, look at that! I never knew about the X.
If you wish to get rid of a bit of the noise in your picture, download a free program called "Neat Image".
http://www.neatimage.com/
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24-10-2007, 10:40 AM
67champ's Avatar
67champ
Registered User

67champ is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 221
I was thinking (and hoping) that the November 2007 Lunar X on the Moon (Werner X) illumination for North America might be more brillant and visible then most. This was based on the fact that I was able to see the reflection with an unaided eye during my first observation back in 1978. (No, I couldn't make out the "X" shape, but I could see a speck of light just off into the dark side of the teminator that night, which I then observed the "X" shape with a 60mm refractor). This November illumination will be very very close in libration (lat and long) to the 1978 event; and I thought this may be the key factor in repeating the specatular 1978 optical event. However, I have been reminded that libration does not affect the illumination of lunar features as I am thinking it might. If this is true, what would? Thanks!

dana t
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24-10-2007, 01:53 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
A really big torch?.

I saw two "shooting" star cross to form a X recently Dana... I thought of you.

alex
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-10-2007, 01:54 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Nice image I forgot to say.
alex
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 24-10-2007, 02:00 PM
67champ's Avatar
67champ
Registered User

67champ is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 221
Thank you Sir Alex.

dt
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement