#1  
Old 23-05-2005, 09:03 AM
rmcpb's Avatar
rmcpb (Rob)
Compulsive Tinkerer

rmcpb is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
Posts: 1,766
Collimation Question??

I am having real problems with seeing small bright objects. The mooms of Jupiter have two " tails" as do stars, ie they are not pin points of light. I have collimated till I have run out of ideas, all the rings match up and the star test gives beautiful concentric circles.

I can easily go to 400x on the moon but the cloud bands in Jupiter at anything over 80x have no detail, I used to be able to see some of the festoony bits once.

Are my eyes stuffing up??

Any ideas please.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23-05-2005, 09:35 AM
vindictive666's Avatar
vindictive666 (John)
KeyboardNotFndPressAnyKey

vindictive666 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: geraldton western australia
Posts: 1,184
ive got no ideas but am getting the same with the jupiters moons i have checked and mine is still out of collimation ? so ill following this post
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23-05-2005, 10:03 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
That's exactly the symptoms I had, on the moons of Jupiter. It turns out that my secondary mirror was pinched in the holder (very tight) and was causing this. My primary mirror could also have been a bit looser.

So after rectifying both of these problems, and re-collimating, the moons of Jupiter are now pinpoints of light to me.

Hope that helps. Geoff has done a how-to on fixing this, but i'm yet to load it onto the main site. Will do so in the next day or two hopefully.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23-05-2005, 10:04 AM
atalas's Avatar
atalas
Registered User

atalas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,151
Hey Rob ,maybe the seeing bad!can happen,

Louie
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23-05-2005, 10:46 AM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
After seeing the images from a few of the GSO dobs at the recent Vic iceinspace star party, it became clear that a how-to on detecting and rectifying these issues could help a lot of people.

I spoke to Dave47Tuc last night. After fixing his gso dobs astigmatism problem he is very happy with the image he is now getting.

Stay tuned !
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23-05-2005, 11:02 AM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
Yeah, this collimation is an Art form.

Rob, I have good to very good images but the collimation tool is off centre. Weird huh!

Below is a drawing of my collimation results. The Cheshire dot is exactly in the centre of the Mirror centre-spot and they are both perfectly lined up on the cross-hairs. All the way it is supposed to be and yet the whole lot is off centre.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (collimation error.jpg)
5.6 KB112 views
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 23-05-2005, 11:06 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
BD: I think that's a result of secondary offset. Apparently that's not so much of a problem and something you needn't worry about.

I'm sure one of the experts will chip in here with the reasons why.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 23-05-2005, 11:20 AM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
Thanks Mike,

I know that a 2ndry needs offset, BUT that seems a loooong way off centre.

Any help?

Rob, sorry to cut in on your thread, but this might help any collimation problems you have too.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 23-05-2005, 11:42 AM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
ditto ken. mines the same but not off by quite that much.
and I htink I have the tight secondary prob too
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 23-05-2005, 12:21 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Ken maybe your focuser isnt square to the tube, or the spider isnt centred properly.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 23-05-2005, 12:31 PM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
Geoff,

The Spider it centred. I checked that a few times. I think you may be right about the Focuser though. I will check it for square again.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 24-05-2005, 02:42 AM
RAJAH235's Avatar
RAJAH235
A very 'Senior' member.

RAJAH235 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South Coast N.S.W.
Posts: 2,571
Hiya all, The 2ndary has to have offset. If you start with the basics of squaring your focuser tube to the optical path, (see below), then centering the 2ndary in the focuser tube & continuing on from there, you'll find the 2ndary will be offset towards the primary & away from the focuser.
The distances/measurements vary, naturally, with each t'scope. See these> (http://www.andysshotglass.com/Collimating.html)
(http://skyandtelescope.com/printable...rticle_790.asp)
I start by blue tacking a white sheet of paper inside the tube, opposite the focuser, so that I can see 'AROUND' the 2ndary, which is then adjusted so that it is in the 'centre of the focuser tube'. ( in other words, the circle, between the focuser & the edge of the 2ndary). The rest of the collimation takes place from there.
Ken, the view that you are getting is correct, if the optical, (NOT Mechanical), centres are lined up. HTH. Regards. L.

Last edited by RAJAH235; 24-05-2005 at 02:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 24-05-2005, 10:18 AM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
Ok Laurie. It just looks too far off though!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 24-05-2005, 11:14 PM
RAJAH235's Avatar
RAJAH235
A very 'Senior' member.

RAJAH235 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South Coast N.S.W.
Posts: 2,571
Hi Ken, Mine looks like yours too. But it's almost 'perfect'. Meade build the offset into the 2ndary holder. You just have to collimate it correctly!
If the views are great & the stars have good diff. rings, & you get pinpoints, who cares what the position of the mirrors looks like? It must be right!
Regards, L.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 27-05-2005, 08:30 AM
rmcpb's Avatar
rmcpb (Rob)
Compulsive Tinkerer

rmcpb is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
Posts: 1,766
Not my eyes

Fell for the oldest trick in the book. The secondary was too low and not centred correctly. That meant it had to be off axis to bring the light cone into the eyepiece and the result... multiple tails on the images.

A good case for a truss setup, that would have been easily detected as I found it when I pulled the secondary out to see if it was pinched in the holder.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-06-2005, 09:20 AM
Dave47tuc's Avatar
Dave47tuc (David)
IIS member 65

Dave47tuc is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mornington peninsula. Victoria.
Posts: 1,658
Hi

Found this site on collimation.http://www.andysshotglass.com/Collimating.html

Heavy download so have broadband.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement