Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 02-01-2016, 04:07 PM
lazjen's Avatar
lazjen (Chris)
PI cult member

lazjen is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Flaxton, Qld
Posts: 2,078
Horsehead Nebula in Ha

I'm a latecomer to publishing the Horsehead Nebula this season. I did this over New Year's Eve and New Year's nights (dodging clouds), so it's "years" in the making...

HA only, 10 min subs at -10C. This image uses 21 subs (3.5 hrs), although I had another 4 more subs that I could not get registered.

I used 15 darks, no flats. The darks I did on New Year's night during the cloudy sessions. The image has barely been cropped, just to get rid of the integration artifacts at the edges.

The noise in this image was terrible and you won't have to look hard at finding some. The black spots that are everywhere, but most prevalent in the top left, are awful. Any ideas on fixing in the processing?

Assuming I go back and redo the processing I will probably try to clean up the stars a bit more. I think I read something about that somewhere - will have to hunt for the details again. So any tips here also appreciated.

Old version: Click image for larger version

Name:	2015_16_horsehead_nebula_ha_40percent.png
Views:	106
Size:	158.6 KB
ID:	192872
New Version: Click image for larger version

Name:	2015_16_horsehead_nebula_ha_2.jpg
Views:	100
Size:	169.6 KB
ID:	192909

A larger version of the new version can be seen here: https://flic.kr/p/CbJPMv


Side note: Guiding for these images was interesting. I was using PHD2 and it picked up a very bright star, so much so that my normal 1 sec exposures were blowing it right out and not giving very good guiding results. So I went to 0.2, 0.1 and 0.05 sec guiding (at different times, wondering how low I could go). This was amazing. The bullseye target became very tight, with almost everything in the inner 1" ring (which you'd hope with such a short exposure time). In turn the mount adjustments were a lot smaller too, although, of course, quite frequent.

Last edited by lazjen; 03-01-2016 at 11:26 AM. Reason: New version
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-01-2016, 11:31 AM
lazjen's Avatar
lazjen (Chris)
PI cult member

lazjen is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Flaxton, Qld
Posts: 2,078
I've updated the original post with a new version. I got some feedback elsewhere and have fixed a few issues in the processing.

My main problem was using the AutomaticBackgroundExtractor in the old version. It wrecked things more than I realised at the time.

This time I did not bother with any background extraction, but I used MultiLinearTransformation on a DrizzleIntegration image instead to help with the noise - plus a crop on the left to remove the horrible noise in the bottom left.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-01-2016, 11:37 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
That's a very good HH. Nailed the focus. Very sharp. Terrific details.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-01-2016, 12:14 PM
lazjen's Avatar
lazjen (Chris)
PI cult member

lazjen is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Flaxton, Qld
Posts: 2,078
Thanks Marc. The auto focus routine in APT does work very well.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-01-2016, 03:05 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,689
Yeah the new version is much better Chris

Nice work

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-01-2016, 03:43 PM
lazjen's Avatar
lazjen (Chris)
PI cult member

lazjen is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Flaxton, Qld
Posts: 2,078
Thanks Mike. When I look back at the first one, I wonder what I was thinking at the time.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-01-2016, 08:19 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by lazjen View Post
Thanks Mike. When I look back at the first one, I wonder what I was thinking at the time.
I think we have all been in that position once or twice

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-01-2016, 09:36 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Nice details, Chris. I held off commenting on the first version

Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
I think we have all been in that position once or twice
Three or four times in my case

Cheers,
Rick.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-01-2016, 09:51 PM
lazjen's Avatar
lazjen (Chris)
PI cult member

lazjen is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Flaxton, Qld
Posts: 2,078
Haha, indeed. I really should just skip to the second version each time, would save me a lot of effort
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-01-2016, 08:39 PM
Slawomir's Avatar
Slawomir (Suavi)
Registered User

Slawomir is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Queensland
Posts: 3,240
I like the second version too, nice work Chris
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-01-2016, 09:13 PM
lazjen's Avatar
lazjen (Chris)
PI cult member

lazjen is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Flaxton, Qld
Posts: 2,078
Thanks Slawomir. I probably should get more data for it, but I suspect I'll do something different the next time we get a gap in these clouds...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement