#1  
Old 01-03-2005, 05:10 PM
mick pinner's Avatar
mick pinner
Astrolounge

mick pinner is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: monbulk-vic
Posts: 2,010
Moon Shot

Whoever said this was addictive was spot-on, thanks for the feed back guys and gals any preferences on what gear to get for ccd imaging would be appreciated.
Mick.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (moon13.jpg)
34.4 KB185 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-03-2005, 05:59 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Ever thought of a Canon 300D Mick. Good for both worlds. Then if you decide the the costs are becoming astronomical ( god I kill me sometimes ) and it's not for you then at least you've still got a very good normal camera. Althought I did hear that Rumples Riot may be willing to part with his DSI ( )

Or you could join the ever expanding crowd of proud ToUcam owners and start with lunar and planetary imaging.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-03-2005, 07:54 PM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
Blow it, I'll wade in with my 2 cents worth as well.
Lunar/Planetary imaging: The ToUcam.
DSO/everything else: A DSLR (I have a Nikon, but the Canon line is good as well especially the 300D).
Simple really.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-03-2005, 09:38 PM
Astroman's Avatar
Astroman (Andrew Wall)
<><><><>

Astroman is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paralowie, South Australia
Posts: 4,367
Hi gbeal,

If you prefer Nikon, check out the D70, nice camera, pretty low noise too, seen a few images on the net taken with them, they look fantastic. Both the Canon and Nikon have great features for astrophotography. I think the canon is much lighter though, handy for throwing it on the end of a Newtonian.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-03-2005, 06:20 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Excellent mick, you're hooked already

Agree with the others, for lunar/planetary, the ToUcam is the best choice. For deepspace, a DSLR is usually the preferred option, unless you can afford a dedicated commercial astro CCD camera. A cheaper option than the DSLR is to get a long-exposure modified ToUcam, or even a DSI for $500.

Good luck!

btw here's a quick reprocess..

You should try a faster shutter speed on your moon shots, to avoid over-exposing the light areas like you see on the RHS. It's very addictive!
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (moon13[1].jpg)
56.5 KB127 views
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-03-2005, 07:00 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Mike is the toucam superior to a DSLR for lunar and planetary or just that its cheaper ?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-03-2005, 09:05 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
It's superior, no question. It can take far more frames in a shorter period of time, meaning you can capture the moments of good seeing.

The only good thing about the DSLR is it's wide field of view at prime focus, when compared with the Toucam. So taking full or whole moon shots is much easier.. but you can make a mosaic with the ToUcam and the result will be much better with a higher resolution (if done well )
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement