Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Observational and Visual Astronomy

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 17-12-2005, 09:45 PM
Stu's Avatar
Stu
southcelestialpole.org

Stu is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Seaford, Victoria
Posts: 366
But the Pentax EP are more expensive at the shorter focal length and most of the time you get what you pay for so I'd expect them to be better. I think the 15mm pano rocks though!

But I do wish they had made pano's in shorter FL's. I still haven't received my radian so can't comment on that one. I would like to use the pentax for a longer time than what I have. Hard when you don't own one...
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 17-12-2005, 11:04 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Sadly the panoptic design doesnt seem to scale down for shorter focal lengths without eye relief becomming an issue. All designs are a comprimise in one way or another.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-01-2006, 11:10 PM
danielsun's Avatar
danielsun
Canon collector

danielsun is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Taylors Lakes Melb
Posts: 1,965
Yes I agree the seeing here in taylors lakes was the best i'd seen for a while!!!

All the popular targets eta carinae, tarantula,lmc jewel box, saturn etc, etc.. were fatastic especially with my new r&p focuser modification wich was a major improvment and made my viewing much more enjoyable!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement