Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > ATM and DIY Projects

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 27-08-2022, 07:42 PM
BadWolf's Avatar
BadWolf (Stewart)
Registered User

BadWolf is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by hamishbarker View Post
I have a chamber and can recoat your 6" and secondary, bare aluminium only though, I have not got Silicon overcoat happening yet. But I am in Nelson NZ. So you would have 2 way postage cost, circa $50 each way I guess, depending on how bulky and heavy. Best way to ship is to build a solid, slim wooden box with secure, lead-faced clips at 3 or 4 points around the mirror bevel.

I've successfully aluminized 4 mirrors so far (10", 6", 12" and a couple of secondaries). $50 plus $10/inch, so $110 plus postage.

For any other mirror makers or those needing recoats to old mirrors, the chamber can currently take up to 16". An upgrade to a bigger chamber is in the works to take up to 25.5".

Cheers,
Hamish

Thanks for the offer Hamish - much appreciated. I have made contact with member who can do the job, so once I finish the math and the planning I will get moving on the project.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 27-08-2022, 07:44 PM
BadWolf's Avatar
BadWolf (Stewart)
Registered User

BadWolf is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by astro744 View Post
Please confirm the 42mm is the minor axis of the secondary, i.e. narrowest width. It is an odd size for a US company like Coulter to use. Sizes used to be as follows in inches:

1, 1.3, 1.52, 1.83, 2.14, 2.6, 3.1, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12

Multiply each by 25.4 to get mm. If 42mm is the major axis then first divide by 1.414.

That being said there is only so small you can go with 6" f5 as there are physical restriction of tube diameter, focuser height and desired edge of field illumination. I have an Astro-Optical 6" f5.5 "Super Short" and they used a 1.83" secondary for it. GSO 6" f5 use a 50mm secondary and Teleskop-Express use 63mm but it is optimized for astrophotography. The detrimental effects of an oversized secondary are often overstated so don't be too concerned with 42mm as it is on the smaller end for a 6" f5 but it does depend on what focuser and tube you have. SCTs have far more obstruction yet still provide good planetary views. Ideally 25% and under is optimal but at 28% I wouldn't worry about it if the secondary is good.

Now after saying all that the modern offerings for Asia are metric and not a direct swap with existing secondary mirrors especially if they are held in place rather than glued.. It may not be that simple to simply change the secondary.

You are correct about the secondary - my error. It is actually 46mm (1.83 inches in oldspeak). I am in the process of doing all the math at present. Thanks for the info.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement