Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 28-01-2011, 12:47 PM
toc (Tim)
Registered User

toc is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 863
C8 vs C9.25 vs 180mm MAK?

Hi all - I currently own a good old C8, and use it mostly for planetary and lunar work. Im thinking of moving to either the C9.25 or possibly a Skywatcher black diamond 180mm MAK. Would either of these scopes be significantly better for planetary?

I know that a large Newtonian is probably better, but Im looking for something that is manageable and fairly compact. (I guess the C9.25 is probably at the limit of this already - I have a HEQ5 pro mount)

Abuse away if this is an annoying question :-)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 28-01-2011, 02:07 PM
Dave47tuc's Avatar
Dave47tuc (David)
IIS member 65

Dave47tuc is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mornington peninsula. Victoria.
Posts: 1,658
Hi Tim,
Aperture always wins with the views of the heavens. But really there is not much between the 3 you asked about, I know as i have had them all. At the moment i have the Mak 180 on a CG5 mount. Also I'm about to get a C8 and use it for imaging. If I was to pick one out of the 3 it would be the 9.25 but i would prefer a bigger mount. So with my mount the smaller 2 are better. For planetary work you talk about as I said not much between the 3.
I like the Mak as its long focal length lends it self to using good eye relief eyepieces. But really all 3 scopes do. As you have a C8 I would not bother buying the Mak yes maybe get the 9.25 but really the next step up should be minimum C11 or bigger then you need a bigger mount. If you can have a look through a Mak and your welcome to come and see mine and try to look through a 9.25 i think you will find no point on stepping to either.
All fun to think about, a pic of my mak on the CG5 easy set up not to big and heavy but hey your gear is nice stick with it.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (DSCF4533.JPG)
126.8 KB171 views
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 28-01-2011, 02:28 PM
toc (Tim)
Registered User

toc is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 863
Thanks - exactly the sort of info Im after...

C11 would be amazing, but I'm not sure the funds will stretch that far.

I guess another option might be the Intes Micro 6 inch MAKs that a lot of people rave about...Im with you though on aperture rules...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28-01-2011, 02:34 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Yes, aperture is king, just like seeing.

Having owned a C9.25 I'd own one again no problems. I have a C11 now. Having the C9.25 - Well I was still getting aperture fevor for planet imaging.

I can't comment on a MAK having never owned one.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement