Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 07-08-2010, 01:49 AM
ptc (Richard)
Registered User

ptc is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 124
Cass-A: a difficult target from the North and impossible from the south

I took this from my backyard in 2007. It was a faint bugger that seemingly took forever to capture in tricolor emission line. I did this at full resolution instead of binning 2x2 (which would have sped things up considerably). I just wanted it with as much detail as my system could supply

After 22 hours of exposure over a month roughly I decided to stop. I may shoot this one again from the ranch with the much better skies/seeing...

http://www.narrowbandimaging.com/3c4...2hao3_page.htm
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-08-2010, 07:53 AM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
A great attempt at a very faint target Most guys I've seen capture this little beastie usually don't even attempt it with anything under a 20" scope. You'd probably do better under darker skies, but it'll still be faint. From where I live in Oz, I can see Cassiopeia, but I still wouldn't attempt this fella...too low down.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-08-2010, 08:46 AM
sjastro's Avatar
sjastro
Registered User

sjastro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,926
Thanks for showing a very obscure object.

Is this a SNR?

Regards

Steven
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-08-2010, 01:29 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by sjastro View Post
Thanks for showing a very obscure object.

Is this a SNR?

Regards

Steven
Cas A, yes.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-08-2010, 02:08 PM
sjastro's Avatar
sjastro
Registered User

sjastro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised View Post
Cas A, yes.
Thanks.

That reminds me of SN1006.

Apparently part of SN1006 still emits photons in the optical range.
I've been intending to image it as challenge.

Steven
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-08-2010, 04:12 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised View Post
Cas A, yes.
Here it is.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-08-2010, 04:16 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Probably from decay products in the remnant.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-08-2010, 04:28 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
Here it is.
Nice video, Marc. You wouldn't want to know but one of these EU twits made comment there!!!!. They're like rabbits....everywhere.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-08-2010, 04:47 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised View Post
Nice video, Marc. You wouldn't want to know but one of these EU twits made comment there!!!!. They're like rabbits....everywhere.
Don't you worry I got the domestos handy just in case.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-08-2010, 05:54 PM
seeker372011's Avatar
seeker372011 (Narayan)
6EQUJ5

seeker372011 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,663
Oh Hi, Richard, good to see you posting your leading edge stuff here in Ice In Space


those additional 5 hours seemed to add quite a bit didn't they
Narayan
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-08-2010, 02:03 AM
ptc (Richard)
Registered User

ptc is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 124
Quote:
Originally Posted by seeker372011 View Post
Oh Hi, Richard, good to see you posting your leading edge stuff here in Ice In Space


those additional 5 hours seemed to add quite a bit didn't they
Narayan
Well thanks Narayan. You just cannot beat adding exposure time, especially if the seeing is good.

As I said earlier I'd prefer to spend three hours processing a week's worth of data than to spend a week processing three hours worth of data...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement