Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut
Thats pretty spectacular, some nice detail on the outer ring, well done.
|
Thanks Fred for having a look and for the nice comments!
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike
Really nice work Richard, it has a real "solid" look to it, like you could reach in and grab it like a dinner plate.
I would have thought seeing, rather than transparency was the thing to have luck with when imaging M104? Getting the detail out in the dust lane seems to be the challenge with this baby and great seeing is what you need here.
Mike
|
Hey yo Mike,
thanks there man!
As I've thought and through many nights out over the years in various conditions, on those slightly moist nights, usually the seeing is iffy (star scintillation, crap in the air) but the transparency into say nebs and galaxies can be pretty good with bringing out fine structure. Not all the time though. So it's hit and miss.... crank it all up and get your feet wet. It was pretty much this way the night I took this run of lums. Quite moist, iffy seeing.
I guess if both seeing and transparency were above average then things can only be better hey!
Any, here's a link (scroll down to 'weather charts and forecasts') with an explanation to what I've pretty much thought/ read/ understood.

Hell, I may have misunderstood, not the first time

not the last
http://astronomy.libsyn.com/?search=...string=spumans
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy
wow, never really seen that before, look forward to the final image
|
Thanks Houghy for checking it out.
Hopefully the weather will play ball when the moon takes a hike!
Quote:
Originally Posted by desler
Wow, very nice!
Darren
|
Cheers for that Darren!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward
Rich. Looks like you have some great data there!
Looks a little too aggressively sharpened to me. I'd back off the processing just a tad so the sky background shows a subtle grain rather than a rough texture.
Guiding focus etc. is spot on.
To do M104 well is a real challenge. Stick with it 
|
Thanks Peter.
My 24" lcd native screen res is way too high for the actual full size image I work with in PS. (tiny chips you know) Since I've had this monitor It seems I tend to over sharpen due to the smallish nature of the image.
Might drop back the res when doing astro images in future, until I get a larger chip.
Thanks for the heads up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig_L
Jumps out at you. Lovely work.
|
thanks Craig.
Hopefully the colour data will help do this more.
Thanks folks for all your comments and stuff.
Always appreciated.

Cheers for now.
Rich .