Having used both Gemini and Argo Navis regularly on a G11 imho they both have their positives and negatives. For a permanent imaging setup my recommendation would be for a Gemini. It will integrate fairly well with most and very well with a few planetarium programs and image capture programs (eg The Sky 6 and MaximDL or CCDSoft etc). This allows much greater flexibility in how you image and the accuracy of your mounts pointing. It will also allow you to automate
some of you imaging, creating mosaics, photometry, astrometry etc.
While the AN will integrate with planetarium programs it won't help you automate you image capture, nor will it (as far as I know) integrate with MaximDL, CCDSoft etc. (Though I could be mistaken here)
For a mobile setup I like the ANs flexibility and ease of setup. It's pointing modelling tends to be a lot quicker than the Gemini to setup. Plus it's quiet!!!! And quite often quicker to get to where you want to go .
As far as pointing accuracy both are great, it depends on how well you set up the pointing model each time, but given a choice I'd say out of the box and set up AN would beat Gemini in the field but in the office Gemini offers imaging flexibility.
If you were just looking for visual observations I'd suggest the Argo Navis, if only for the piece and quiet.