Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > ATM and DIY Projects

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 20-03-2007, 07:00 PM
Peter Bobroff
Registered User

Peter Bobroff is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 15
More photos of scope

Here are some photos of the secondary holder and the filter slide.

A good microscope has a set of good quality eyepieces and a set of good quality objectives - why not a good telescope? Having bought a set of good quality eyepieces why should I only use them on a high power objective. This type of mounting and truss in particular is very suitable for mounting medium and low power objectives.

So I have mounted a 5.5" F3.5 Comet Catcher as the medium power objective, having modified the focuser to take 2" eyepieces. With the 22N This gives a field of 3.6 degrees at 23X. The 31N will also fit but gives an exit pupil of 8.6mm so the effective aperture is probably about 4.3" but the field is 5 degrees.

I am thinking of fitting low power objectives with focal lengths about 200mm and 50mm as well. The very low power objective would have a field of 40 degrees - Gum Nebula perhaps.

The filter slide is a dream. Just pull it out of the eyepiece box and plug it in - filters already loaded. Easy to compare filters and to examine an object in different bands.

The secondary holder is very light and rigid as the overhang is very small. I have bent the rules but not broken any.

See you at SPSP Mike - another long session coming up?
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (151-5104_IMG.JPG)
52.6 KB30 views
Click for full-size image (151-5105_IMG.JPG)
52.3 KB38 views
Click for full-size image (151-5106_IMG.JPG)
32.8 KB19 views
Click for full-size image (151-5109_IMG.JPG)
32.2 KB39 views
Click for full-size image (151-5110_IMG.JPG)
29.9 KB36 views
Click for full-size image (151-5112_IMG.JPG)
41.4 KB20 views
Click for full-size image (151-5113_IMG.JPG)
40.0 KB28 views
Click for full-size image (151-5114_IMG.JPG)
38.6 KB22 views
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 20-03-2007, 07:53 PM
rmcpb's Avatar
rmcpb (Rob)
Compulsive Tinkerer

rmcpb is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
Posts: 1,766
Peter,

What material did you use to make the spider vanes?

Brilliant scope BTW

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 20-03-2007, 08:10 PM
Darkplague's Avatar
Darkplague
Mark

Darkplague is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 305
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmcpb View Post
Peter,

What material did you use to make the spider vanes?

Brilliant scope BTW

Cheers
Going by the photos it looks like hes used 2 S/S rulers for the vanes.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 20-03-2007, 08:45 PM
Peter Bobroff
Registered User

Peter Bobroff is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 15
Spider vane material

You are right - the vanes are made from 600mm stainless rules.

They are tempered enough to be very stiff but soft enough to drill easily.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 20-03-2007, 08:58 PM
rmcpb's Avatar
rmcpb (Rob)
Compulsive Tinkerer

rmcpb is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
Posts: 1,766
That was what I was hoping you would say. Nice and easy to source such materials.

Thanx
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 22-03-2007, 10:47 PM
Peter Bobroff
Registered User

Peter Bobroff is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 15
Need for Paracorr at F/4

On further examination even the 6mm Radian benefits from the Paracorr.

The 12mm Nagler and Paracorr was better at the edges than a 2X Powermate with 22mm Nagler.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement