Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 22-10-2006, 07:33 AM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,825
Images of Mercury & Venus from 2003 & 2004

Hello,

I dug up a couple of old images of the Mercury Transit of May 2003 and the Venus Transit of June 2004 and overlaid them to compare the sizes of the planetary discs against the Sun. Both images are severely vignetted as I was using a consumer Minolta DiMage 7Hi afocally. It is quite an interesting size comparison.

Cheers

Dennis
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Venus Mercury Photo Composite Text.jpg)
50.3 KB25 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22-10-2006, 07:44 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Wow Dennis, a very interesting comparison. It's going to be much more difficult to see this time around.

No (filter protected) naked eye views unfortunately
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 22-10-2006, 08:48 AM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Yep it will be a challenge, the ol' Mercury is not much bigger than the moon, only a thousand or so kms in it. (4880 V 3500 approx)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 22-10-2006, 09:01 AM
sheeny's Avatar
sheeny (Al)
Spam Hunter

sheeny is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oberon NSW
Posts: 14,438
Thanks Dennis! I hadn't really thought about it but I think I was expecting Mercury to appear a bit larger then that, so it will help to have an idea of just how small it will be when the time comes.

Wouldn't it be disappointing to be looking for a larger disc only to find that 1st contact is over before you found it!

Al.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 22-10-2006, 09:22 AM
sheeny's Avatar
sheeny (Al)
Spam Hunter

sheeny is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oberon NSW
Posts: 14,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by [1ponders]
Yep it will be a challenge, the ol' Mercury is not much bigger than the moon, only a thousand or so kms in it. (4880 V 3500 approx)
I didn't realise it is so close to the Raleigh Criteria for the PST (2995 km)! Hmmm... should the plan be, then, to use max magnification in the PST? Say a 5 or 6mm EP or a barlow/powermate?

Al.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 22-10-2006, 01:53 PM
jjjnettie's Avatar
jjjnettie (Jeanette)
Registered User

jjjnettie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
Gee it's small isn't it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement