Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 26-02-2023, 08:42 AM
DiscoDuck's Avatar
DiscoDuck (Paul)
Raider Nation

DiscoDuck is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 694
A Hamburger with a Nebula side

A couple of shots from a trip to the Flinders Ranges in South Australia last weekend: NGC 3628 and NGC 2626.

Taken with a ZWO 294-MM on a GSO RC8 and AP Mach1. About 18 and 9 hours total exposure for the burger and nebula respectively.

A lot of problems processing the Hamburger as that tidal tail is very faint and my flats were undercorrecting slightly - the error being larger than the brightness of the tail!

Astrobin links:
https://www.astrobin.com/full/4ehuk9/B/
https://www.astrobin.com/full/87tkvd/0/
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (230220 NGC3628 IIS.jpg)
199.1 KB135 views
Click for full-size image (230220 NGC2626 IIS.jpg)
196.7 KB115 views

Last edited by DiscoDuck; 27-02-2023 at 09:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26-02-2023, 08:55 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
Spectacular images Paul.

Greg
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26-02-2023, 09:00 AM
Todo43 (Lachlan)
Registered User

Todo43 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Sydney
Posts: 76
Great images Paul. Love the tidal tail on Hamburger



Your collimation looks great! How did you collimate your scope?

I've just recently started imaging with a 6RC and am struggling to collimate it. Don't have any tools so that's a struggle but I tried on a star last night and got better results than I had.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26-02-2023, 11:57 AM
Dave882 (David)
Registered User

Dave882 is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: PADSTOW
Posts: 2,499
Both those images are fantastic! Particularly impressed with the hamburger and the detail you’ve revealed both in the body and tidal stream. Very hard to do well like this especially without dark sky!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26-02-2023, 12:58 PM
AdamJL
Registered User

AdamJL is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,154
absolutely outstanding. One day I'd like to drive out there for a month and just image. Such beautiful skies!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26-02-2023, 03:08 PM
DiscoDuck's Avatar
DiscoDuck (Paul)
Raider Nation

DiscoDuck is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 694
Thanks Greg, Lachlan, David and Adam.

Lachlan: re collimation, I use the "hall of mirrors" technique https://astrojolo.com/gears/ritchey-...e-first-light/ to make the primary and secondary parallel at any point in the procedure. I also have a Glatter laser with a holographic attachment which generates concentric circles to line the primary up with the centre of the tube.

I have not found a good guaranteed technique, but a combo of the straight laser, the holographic laser and the hall of mirrors seems to get close with some iteration, swearing and crossing of fingers! Often never quite clear whether to adjust primary, secondary or the collimation ring I have on the back - not helped by the lack of a centre spot on my secondary. But make small changes and check. The main source of error is the laser not being central in the focus tube, and I try to guesstimate/fix this by using my rotator to spin the laser round and make sure it doesn't move. Or if it does, the centre of its circle is where the focuser is really pointed.

Finish off with a test on a defocused star and maybe a very slight tweak of the mirror to centre everything up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave882 View Post
Both those images are fantastic! Particularly impressed with the hamburger and the detail you’ve revealed both in the body and tidal stream. Very hard to do well like this especially without dark sky!
David - the skies were very dark. Just not great seeing on 2 of the 4 nights and some dodgy flat frames made it harder than it should have been.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 26-02-2023, 03:56 PM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,782
Hi Paul,
excellent results.
Well done.


cheers
Allan
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 26-02-2023, 10:12 PM
DiscoDuck's Avatar
DiscoDuck (Paul)
Raider Nation

DiscoDuck is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 694
Thanks, Allan.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 27-02-2023, 08:40 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,680
Both look great Paul , nicely composed and great colour, very satisfying results I am sure, despite the difficulties you mention, seems you have mitigated and handled the issues very well, viva la Flinders Ranges!

One thing, I'd be interested to know, what sharpening and noise reduction/sharpening software/filters you used to reveal and enhance the details?

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 27-02-2023, 01:26 PM
DiscoDuck's Avatar
DiscoDuck (Paul)
Raider Nation

DiscoDuck is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 694
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Both look great Paul , nicely composed and great colour, very satisfying results I am sure, despite the difficulties you mention, seems you have mitigated and handled the issues very well, viva la Flinders Ranges!

One thing, I'd be interested to know, what sharpening and noise reduction/sharpening software/filters you used to reveal and enhance the details?

Mike

Thanks Mike.


Noise reduction was using NoiseXTerminator.


Sharpening/detail enhancement was a range of things - BlurXTerminator, high pass filter (in PhotoShop), LocalHistogramEqualisation, etc. Plus the galaxy itself is a stack of fewer images than the surrounds - just cherry picked the lowest FWHM subs.


Viva la Flinders Ranges doesn't have quite the same ring to it as Viva Las Vegas. But then again, I wouldn't want to image from downtown Vegas :-)
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 27-02-2023, 02:01 PM
BigK (Baz)
Registered User

BigK is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5
The challenges were worth the result. Superb images.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 27-02-2023, 04:12 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,680
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiscoDuck View Post
Thanks Mike.


Noise reduction was using NoiseXTerminator.


Sharpening/detail enhancement was a range of things - BlurXTerminator, high pass filter (in PhotoShop), LocalHistogramEqualisation, etc. Plus the galaxy itself is a stack of fewer images than the surrounds - just cherry picked the lowest FWHM subs.


Viva la Flinders Ranges doesn't have quite the same ring to it as Viva Las Vegas. But then again, I wouldn't want to image from downtown Vegas :-)
Looks like those two Russ Croman tools are becoming a bit of a prerequisite.... He makes a reasonable argument on his website for the relative accuracy/level of reality, of his particular neural network/AI methodology. Certainly feels like the "new age" now... or your images will get left behind... ...
Grooooaaan...gotta upgrade the computer and buy the software

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 27-02-2023, 04:25 PM
matlud (Mathew)
Registered User

matlud is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: NZ
Posts: 248
Two great images Paul! Got to love dark skies and you revealed some nice detail there 😀
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 27-02-2023, 04:45 PM
marc4darkskies's Avatar
marc4darkskies (Marcus)
Billions and Billions ...

marc4darkskies is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Quialigo, NSW
Posts: 3,143
Very very nice Paul! Nice work!

Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Looks like those two Russ Croman tools are becoming a bit of a prerequisite ... Grooooaaan...gotta upgrade the computer and buy the software
Believe that when I see it! Don't forget to buy either Photoshop or Pixinsight or both. Full disclosure: I actually had to use PI so I could test out BlurX
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 27-02-2023, 05:06 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by marc4darkskies View Post
Very very nice Paul! Nice work!



Believe that when I see it! Don't forget to buy either Photoshop or Pixinsight or both. Full disclosure: I actually had to use PI so I could test out BlurX
Excellent Paul, a pleasure to view!.
So Marcus, im so close to wanting Blurexteminator, and natch the awful required PI , just for this, being a PS fan boy like yourself, WHAT DO YOU THINK. Is it worth the expense?.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 27-02-2023, 05:39 PM
marc4darkskies's Avatar
marc4darkskies (Marcus)
Billions and Billions ...

marc4darkskies is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Quialigo, NSW
Posts: 3,143
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut View Post
Excellent Paul, a pleasure to view!.
So Marcus, im so close to wanting Blurexteminator, and natch the awful required PI , just for this, being a PS fan boy like yourself, WHAT DO YOU THINK. Is it worth the expense?.
I just did an experiment with blurX on a really lousy image of ngc 7424 (poor seeing) I took 7 years ago. I promptly imported the result into PS 😊. Very impressive result so yes it's worth it. The only other thing I use PI for is for annotating images. At least PI is a permanent licence.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 27-02-2023, 06:06 PM
DiscoDuck's Avatar
DiscoDuck (Paul)
Raider Nation

DiscoDuck is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 694
Thanks Baz, Mathew, Marcus and Fred.

Mike re BlurXTerminator and NoiseXTerminator: working in the cyber/ML field myself, I am generally wary of such tools. But I think Russ has done a very honest job of training them specifically (and thoroughly) for decon and noise reduction respectively. There are ways to architect and train neural networks which could result in mechanisms more akin to replacing images with Hubble-inspired data or even creating features not there, but these RC Astro tools seem to be legit IMHO. And, as you say, being taken up broadly, so we don't wanna be left behind!!

And interesting comments re PI!! I use both it and Photoshop, but mainly PI. I find PI more appealing to my way of thinking (I am a mathematician/scientist) - not sure if it is a preference though generally based on familiarty or mindset ... probably a bit of both. And in any case the one off license saves me a fortune compared to my monthly donation to Adobe's bank account :-)
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 27-02-2023, 06:36 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,680
Quote:
Originally Posted by marc4darkskies View Post
Believe that when I see it! Don't forget to buy either Photoshop or Pixinsight or both. Full disclosure: I actually had to use PI so I could test out BlurX
Feels a bit like 1998 for me,when I thought long and hard about giving in to taking anabolic steroids, the best strongmen were using, even the not so good ones were, they were winning more often, seemed to be stronger (mostly) its expensive too....what to do...? Is this what I do it for? Is it cheating?...dunno?.......wei rd

Mike

Last edited by strongmanmike; 27-02-2023 at 06:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 27-02-2023, 07:04 PM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,782
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post


Feels a bit like 1998 for me,when I thought long and hard about giving in to taking anabolic steroids, the best strongmen were using, even the not so good ones were, they were winning more often, seemed to be stronger (mostly) its expensive too....what to do...? Is this what I do it for? Is it cheating?...dunno?.......wei rd

Mike



Hi Mike,

I suppose some people would call it cheating.
I often used ideas from Ken Crawford -
in his Digging out the Details video:
http://www.imagingdeepsky.com/Presentations.html

It can certainly make an image more appealing
or show something better than no processing.
I think BlurXTerminator is like having a Ken Crawford plugin
for your Photoshop except that it only works in PixInsight.

I think it needs to be done with caution so that details
that aren't there at all are portrayed -
sharpening artifacts -
just like the sharpening worms that we all hate so much.

cheers
Allan
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 27-02-2023, 09:39 PM
DiscoDuck's Avatar
DiscoDuck (Paul)
Raider Nation

DiscoDuck is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 694
Quote:
Originally Posted by alpal View Post
I think it needs to be done with caution so that details
that aren't there at all are portrayed -
sharpening artifacts -
just like the sharpening worms that we all hate so much.

cheers
Allan
Definitely agreed, Allan, to use with care. And also I think only use it for the deconvolution step - it is not meant to be a general sharpening tool afaik.

It does, for deconvolution, seem much less prone to wiggly worms than algorithms like Richardson-Lucy though, so you can push it a bit further than classical decon.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement