Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 24-08-2006, 09:43 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Canon EOS-400D is here.

Hi all,

http://www.canon.com.au/eos400d/

Time to weep. And save.

Regards,
Humayun
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-08-2006, 09:46 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
don't tell Tony
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24-08-2006, 09:59 PM
33South's Avatar
33South (Chris)
Registered User

33South is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wentworth Falls NSW
Posts: 1,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by Octane
Hi all,

http://www.canon.com.au/eos400d/

Time to weep. And save.

Regards,
Humayun
I like the linked advert

Quote:
Originally Posted by [1ponders]
don't tell Tony
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24-08-2006, 10:01 PM
mick pinner's Avatar
mick pinner
Astrolounge

mick pinner is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: monbulk-vic
Posts: 2,010
anyone want to buy a 350D
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-08-2006, 10:05 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by mick pinner
anyone want to buy a 350D
$300
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25-08-2006, 06:01 AM
Robby's Avatar
Robby
Registered User

Robby is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,079
Where's the LCD display to show what shooting mode, ISO, size etc you are in... Don't tell me they overlay that info on the preview LCD screen... That would seroiusly suck!
I still like my 300D old school
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25-08-2006, 07:14 AM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
not interested....
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 25-08-2006, 08:25 AM
acropolite's Avatar
acropolite (Phil)
Registered User

acropolite is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 9,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by Striker
not interested....
....yet...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 25-08-2006, 08:29 AM
RB's Avatar
RB (Andrew)
Moderator

RB is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,643
Quote:
Originally Posted by 33South
I like the linked advert
I like it too Chris, very creative.
Looks like a good deal !
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 25-08-2006, 08:33 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
So what's different about it, from the 350D?

Apart from the 10.1 mp, it looks fairly similar. I like the idea of the self-cleaning sensor (no more dust!)

And how much will it be?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 25-08-2006, 10:15 AM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
Hmm, 10.1 would be nice. But I think I'll be waiting for 12+. The 8mp size of the 350D is my only problem with it - resulting in lower resolution images than I used to get with film. But I don't think 10.1 would be a big enough difference to "make the difference".

Roger.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 25-08-2006, 10:18 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
I agree Roger, I think 12mp would be required before I'd be tempted to upgrade.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 25-08-2006, 10:32 AM
33South's Avatar
33South (Chris)
Registered User

33South is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wentworth Falls NSW
Posts: 1,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman
I agree Roger, I think 12mp would be required before I'd be tempted to upgrade.
me too, I recall reading you need 11+MP (and some $$$$s) to get film resolution.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 25-08-2006, 10:32 AM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by acropolite
....yet...
I think Mick was referring to my cheeky offer of $300 for his 350D
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 25-08-2006, 12:15 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Hi all,

EOS-400D body only - $1,299
EOS-400D + 18-55 - $1,499
EOS-400D + 18-55 + 75-300 - $1,649
EOS-400D + 17-85 IS USM - $2,298

Regards,
Humayun
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 25-08-2006, 12:41 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Interesting, pretty much the same price bracket as the 350D, but with the bigger sensor.

I guess the 350D is likely to drop in price by a few hundred as well.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 25-08-2006, 03:22 PM
Shawn
Mostly Harmless

Shawn is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cairns
Posts: 1,352
Just hope the software doesnt confuse stubborn dust particles as faint diffuse, or lower mag stars,,,All those lovely globulars would look like one huge star.. unles of course theres a menu item hidden in a substructure of step down menus, that says ,,,turn this feature off damn it ... ...
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 25-08-2006, 03:34 PM
Shawn
Mostly Harmless

Shawn is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cairns
Posts: 1,352
But then ,,thinking about that ,,,If it could remove the milky way, ??... that would be worth while for DSO hunters wouldnt it ?...? Also 500 model is proported to being able to see 15 mag stars, and track them on its huge image sensor with 100,000,000 pixels and crop the image to compensate for exposure time and required zoom, software takes care of field rotation. "Park and Shoot" Not really just made it up... LOL,,, I guess it will happen , and probably soon ,,,:>(

Takes the fun out it , yes / no ?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 25-08-2006, 03:34 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
I got the impression that the dust thing was some way of actually physically removing the dust, by some electromagnetic shock or something

I didn't get the impression it took it's own flat field.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 25-08-2006, 03:47 PM
Shawn
Mostly Harmless

Shawn is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cairns
Posts: 1,352
No Mike ,,I think I read it right ,,stubborn was removed by software,,casual dust, its only casual...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement