Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 07-04-2019, 08:46 PM
Granada
The truth is out there

Granada is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 184
The first-ever photograph of a black hole might be unveiled this week

This will be exciting to watch: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-04-...-week/10979244


Live announcement takes place UTC - 4hrs, so 11pm Wed night Melbourne time. Here is the link for the live stream: https://www.nsf.gov/news/special_reports/blackholes/
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-04-2019, 09:04 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
I am looking forward to this.
But it cant be photographed really but the surrounding areas tell tales will be great to see.
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-04-2019, 12:12 AM
billdan's Avatar
billdan (Bill)
Registered User

billdan is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Narangba, SE QLD
Posts: 1,551
ABC News has just shown an image of the black hole inside the giant elliptical galaxy M87 in Virgo.
Taken by the Event Horizon Array of radio telescopes, there is supposed to be an image of Sgr A (Milky Way black hole) coming up soon as well.


https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/...ysics/10989534
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-04-2019, 06:22 AM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,782
Quote:
Originally Posted by billdan View Post
ABC News has just shown an image of the black hole inside the giant elliptical galaxy M87 in Virgo.
Taken by the Event Horizon Array of radio telescopes, there is supposed to be an image of Sgr A (Milky Way black hole) coming up soon as well.


https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/...ysics/10989534

I saw it on channel 7 news this morning -
the black hole inside M87.
What an amazing picture.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-04-2019, 08:31 AM
Slawomir's Avatar
Slawomir (Suavi)
Registered User

Slawomir is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Queensland
Posts: 3,240
That's very interesting, thank you for sharing.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-04-2019, 09:13 AM
lazjen's Avatar
lazjen (Chris)
PI cult member

lazjen is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Flaxton, Qld
Posts: 2,075
Size comparison: https://xkcd.com/2135/
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-04-2019, 09:23 AM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,389
So, is it a torus shape - absolutely what I thought it should look like (unlike the "Saturnesque" Hoolyweird renditions)?

Well, it seems to be a torus to me, and would make sense in terms of physics.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-04-2019, 10:01 AM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,121
Quote:
Originally Posted by LewisM View Post
So, is it a torus shape - absolutely what I thought it should look like (unlike the "Saturnesque" Hoolyweird renditions)?

Well, it seems to be a torus to me, and would make sense in terms of physics.
Allan Duffy gave a good description on ABC news this morning, and yes to us, from our perspective it looks like a torus. The difference in brightness is caused by matter in the event horizon appearing to move towards us in the spin cycle, with the darker areas moving away from us.
Allan also mentioned that Sagitarius A was tried but it was too messy to get a clear image, which I take it meant that the perspective did not favour trying. They have Sag A data so maybe in the future we will see it as well.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-04-2019, 12:58 PM
Sunfish's Avatar
Sunfish (Ray)
Registered User

Sunfish is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Wollongong
Posts: 1,913
It is here

https://horizon-magazine.eu/article/...lack-hole.html
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-04-2019, 12:48 AM
Stonius's Avatar
Stonius (Markus)
Registered User

Stonius is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,508
Quote:
Originally Posted by LewisM View Post
So, is it a torus shape - absolutely what I thought it should look like (unlike the "Saturnesque" Hoolyweird renditions)?

Well, it seems to be a torus to me, and would make sense in terms of physics.
I cant figure this out; so we're looking at a disc that presents face on to us, but the polar jets we see are are also extending laterally?
An equitorial torus would make sense, but a pole to pole torus?
Or is it a gas shell that just appears denser at the edges.

Markus
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-04-2019, 07:58 AM
Sunfish's Avatar
Sunfish (Ray)
Registered User

Sunfish is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Wollongong
Posts: 1,913
Are we almost looking straight down the cone of the beam?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-04-2019, 08:22 AM
Stonius's Avatar
Stonius (Markus)
Registered User

Stonius is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,508
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunfish View Post
Are we almost looking straight down the cone of the beam?
True, maybe those jets are more on-axis than I thought...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-04-2019, 09:15 AM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 7,105
Maybe this link may help to claryfy what we are looking at on this picture:
https://youtu.be/zUyH3XhpLTo
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-04-2019, 09:57 AM
croweater (Richard)
Don't Panic!

croweater is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mount Gambier, South Australia
Posts: 561
Thanks for the very helpful link Bojan. I just have to watch it a couple more times for it to sink right in. Cheers, Richard.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-04-2019, 09:58 AM
Sunfish's Avatar
Sunfish (Ray)
Registered User

Sunfish is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Wollongong
Posts: 1,913
Thanks Bojan.
A lot going on there that the Europeans did not go into.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bojan View Post
Maybe this link may help to claryfy what we are looking at on this picture:
https://youtu.be/zUyH3XhpLTo
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-04-2019, 12:34 PM
Stonius's Avatar
Stonius (Markus)
Registered User

Stonius is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,508
Quote:
Originally Posted by bojan View Post
Maybe this link may help to claryfy what we are looking at on this picture:
https://youtu.be/zUyH3XhpLTo
Ah yes, that makes sense.

Answer to my question at the following time
https://youtu.be/zUyH3XhpLTo?t=398
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 13-04-2019, 10:24 PM
StephenV (Stephen)
Registered User

StephenV is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7
I don't know why they have to do the publicity generating pre-announcement, why not just release the image straight away?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 15-04-2019, 08:52 AM
julianh72 (Julian)
Registered User

julianh72 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Kelvin Grove
Posts: 1,301
Quote:
Originally Posted by StephenV View Post
I don't know why they have to do the publicity generating pre-announcement, why not just release the image straight away?
I think the pre-release hype actually worked. When was the last time an astronomical photograph got the sort of main-stream media interest that the Black Hole photo did?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 15-04-2019, 11:01 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Promotion of this wonderful achievement is intense and expected giving the push to elevate gravity wave astronomy as the cutting edge.

Look at the stirred up controversy re the lady partly responsible for the key algorithm and the gossip type nonsence getting air time. All irrelevant but perfect to draw attention from folk who would never have given black holes a passing glance.

The promotion has been expertly managed and I suspect part of a bigger picture to attract research funds to GR in general.

Meanwhile science benefits from the hustle to popularise black holes.

But what we need for all this stuff is competing research teams so one can review the work of the other...if not for the space race we never would have put men on the Moon..and such an approach not only would double the available jobs for scientists but also have competitors seeking to get a better result than the most recent produced by their competitor.

Still all funding is best directed to building battle stars so we can involve the military budget☺
Alex
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement