Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Equipment Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 18-10-2013, 07:18 AM
hobbit
Registered User

hobbit is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Campbelltown
Posts: 379
Yeah it's not too far. I'll check them out.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 18-11-2013, 08:11 PM
mkeech (Mark)
Registered User

mkeech is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Perth
Posts: 5
could anyone tell me what they think a fair price would be to ask for a new neq6pro mount , only unboxed twice
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 24-11-2013, 01:33 PM
impactcrater11
Registered User

impactcrater11 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: SYDNEY
Posts: 7
all good advice here....if you don't know which scope you need for astrophotography , you are not ready for it.
you have an excellent camera , so no problems there.
in today's world a few small photos of the rings of jupiter will leave people wondering why you do it. they are used to fabulous images...
you need dark clear skies to get 'wow' images...
the scope needs an equatorial mount...
it needs to track the object for hours of photos....
the scope needs a BIG aperture and I'm talking 16 inches for the 'wow' factor

the retailers in oz answer questions wonderfully , and they will give you options , and then you still need to understand what your photos will end up being like...
finally, lots of astro photos show things which equire special filters and false colour imaging ....
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 24-11-2013, 01:56 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Quote:
Originally Posted by impactcrater11 View Post
...
the scope needs a BIG aperture and I'm talking 16 inches for the 'wow' factor

the retailers in oz answer questions wonderfully , and they will give you options , and then you still need to understand what your photos will end up being like...
finally, lots of astro photos show things which equire special filters and false colour imaging ....
I don't know if throwing newbies in the deep end is such a good idea lest they drown. Plus I've seen many 'wow' images with camera lenses and short tele's.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 24-11-2013, 03:18 PM
Larryp's Avatar
Larryp (Laurie)
Registered User

Larryp is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjjnettie View Post
I used to be secretary of this society many years ago, and they are a great bunch of people. You would find lots of help there, and they have an equatorially mounted C14 which is used for photography-members can take part once trained in equipment use.
I would suggest looking on IIS at the images taken by members-most list the equipment used, and this would give you an idea of what you need for whatever type of imaging you want to do.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 24-11-2013, 11:17 PM
Forgey (Paula)
Registered User

Forgey is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Thurgoona, NSW
Posts: 922
Quote:
Originally Posted by impactcrater11 View Post
all good advice here....if you don't know which scope you need for astrophotography , you are not ready for it.
you have an excellent camera , so no problems there.
in today's world a few small photos of the rings of jupiter will leave people wondering why you do it. they are used to fabulous images...
you need dark clear skies to get 'wow' images...
the scope needs an equatorial mount...
it needs to track the object for hours of photos....
the scope needs a BIG aperture and I'm talking 16 inches for the 'wow' factor

the retailers in oz answer questions wonderfully , and they will give you options , and then you still need to understand what your photos will end up being like...
finally, lots of astro photos show things which equire special filters and false colour imaging ....
Many images on this forum are taken with a 80mm or 100mm telescope and they are 'WOW' . In fact a good starter telescope is the ED80.

Dark skies help but I have gotten images from the suburbs.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 24-11-2013, 11:18 PM
2stroke's Avatar
2stroke (Jay)
The devil's advocate

2stroke is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 816
Quote:
Originally Posted by impactcrater11 View Post
all good advice here....if you don't know which scope you need for astrophotography , you are not ready for it.
you have an excellent camera , so no problems there.
in today's world a few small photos of the rings of jupiter will leave people wondering why you do it. they are used to fabulous images...
you need dark clear skies to get 'wow' images...
the scope needs an equatorial mount...
it needs to track the object for hours of photos....
the scope needs a BIG aperture and I'm talking 16 inches for the 'wow' factor

the retailers in oz answer questions wonderfully , and they will give you options , and then you still need to understand what your photos will end up being like...
finally, lots of astro photos show things which equire special filters and false colour imaging ....
ROFL 16" , so forget about that $13K taki 6" TOA-150B because its just cheap junk? Lol this post is going to a few other forums and friends for the lol factor. What a 16" gso newt kills a TOA-150 ? man why are we all buying into taks?

hahaha best post of the year
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 24-11-2013, 11:25 PM
Larryp's Avatar
Larryp (Laurie)
Registered User

Larryp is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2stroke View Post
ROFL 16" , so forget about that $13K taki 6" TOA-150B because its just cheap junk? Lol this post is going to a few other forums and friends for the lol factor. What a 16" gso newt kills a TOA-150 ? man why are we all buying into taks?

hahaha best post of the year
Quite true, Jay. And as Paula has said, some of the best images you will see have been taken through an ED80
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 24-11-2013, 11:53 PM
2stroke's Avatar
2stroke (Jay)
The devil's advocate

2stroke is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 816
Anyhow just look at he guys who have a few post and there advice is spot on. The ED80 is a great scope, you could go a ed100 or ed120 pending your budget and a nice eq6 or heq5. The ED80 has a very nice FOV with a dslr sensor and gives a lot of forgiveness with guiding or without. It pretty much the prefect scope to start with and nearly everyone has who is into imaging, its just the best bang for buck scope there is and perfect for the novice and even seasoned veterans. You could jump into it deeper but it comes down to budget, and well since your hard on using your stock dslr i doubt you have pocket fulls of cash.

Anyhow pool the advise given here and the average speaks the truth, as for mounts it the base of imaging and well yer a heq5 is about the minimum you want, the eq6 offers a bigger payload though the heq5 is perfect for up to a max of a 8" newt (its pushing it to the limits but its proven and done) and will handle almost any APO refractor with in price reasoning to the mount cost just fine. The eq6 is better because it will handle a 8" newt alot better and there have being a few users who have put a 10" newt on them and imaged.

All this gear is synta aka sky watcher/Orion/saxon and is what you call entry level and will produce some very great images, though after this things will start to sky rocket price wise and you can worry about upgrading when your reached the maximum potential you can go with this gear, many years away trust me lol. After that Tak scopes, sbig ccd's and mx mounts ect will come into the picture, sbig ccd's and other ccd's more likely way before hand
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 25-11-2013, 12:27 PM
impactcrater11
Registered User

impactcrater11 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: SYDNEY
Posts: 7
'Zero Image-Shift Microfocuser. Optional for the 8", 10", 12",14" and standard with the 16" models, allows you to obtain precise image focus with no image movement. Perfect for astroimaging or during planetary observation. Focus is controlled thru the Autostar II handbox.'

please note this is a direct quote from "Meade' and refers to the Meade LX200 ACF series of scopes....hard to beat perfection !
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 25-11-2013, 12:51 PM
impactcrater11
Registered User

impactcrater11 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: SYDNEY
Posts: 7
hobbit,
I express my admiration to you . whilst some have called your camera 'stock' and implied some monetary difficulties for your equipment purchases , I can only say you have a real interest in photography considering that your camera is a NIKON D800 DSLR which retails locally for $3, 389 for the body only and I know that the lenses can run to similar costs.
All I can say is aim high and WOW me !
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement